Joined: Jul 20 2008 Posts: 1484 Location: Warrington - East Hull Lad At Heart
Barky wrote:Me too and I drew the same conclusion.
PS does anyone know what that song is at the end of the coverage? The one with the drum intro....
Rob - I've criticised KC commentary before, not heard your commentary before though and on Hull FC tv for the Jake Webster try it's more enthusiastic than Rob Park! Good stuff ha.
Stirlingshire Saint wrote: If HKR win at Saints, I will personally bare my backside on the town hall steps in Hull.
Stirlingshire Saint wrote:
In summary, HKR are made up of of a few overrated foreigners, a couple of Wigan rejects and a couple of blokes I have never heard of.
Saints by plenty, by miles even!
Stirlingshire Saint wrote: A walkover for Saints.
HKR are about as poor as it gets.
When referring to the atmosphere of the HJ...
Wire On The Telly wrote: ...
Shame it doesn't keep the sound like the full east stand of HKR. That's atmosphere.
Video replys mean nothing as far as forward passes go, thats why we sensibly don't allow video calls on them.
The angle that is shown on Hull FC's website would suggest a forward pass, momentum however does come in to play and I can imagine that from another angle that it wouldn't look like one.
Either way, it was a very close call. People saying it was a clear cut decision or a "mile forward" are clearly just seeing what they want to see. As are those that say it definetly wasn't.
If you are interested in Building Information Modelling (BIM). PM me.
Joined: May 09 2009 Posts: 1113 Location: East Hull
BalearicHullFan wrote:Video replys mean nothing as far as forward passes go, thats why we sensibly don't allow video calls on them.
The angle that is shown on Hull FC's website would suggest a forward pass, momentum however does come in to play and I can imagine that from another angle that it wouldn't look like one.
Either way, it was a very close call. People saying it was a clear cut decision or a "mile forward" are clearly just seeing what they want to see. As are those that say it definetly wasn't.
Joined: Oct 26 2007 Posts: 2570 Location: East Hull is Wonderful
BalearicHullFan wrote:Video replys mean nothing as far as forward passes go, thats why we sensibly don't allow video calls on them.
The angle that is shown on Hull FC's website would suggest a forward pass, momentum however does come in to play and I can imagine that from another angle that it wouldn't look like one.
Either way, it was a very close call. People saying it was a clear cut decision or a "mile forward" are clearly just seeing what they want to see. As are those that say it definetly wasn't.
Finally a sensible take on it, you're quite right why they don't go to the 4th official, it is solely the call of the ref, he called forward, and he's is the only opinion that matters as far as the game goes, so the record books will just record it as an error, end of, think it's time to lock this one, the well is dry.
Barton Flyer wrote:texted my son to say light at the end of the tunnel, unfortunately it was a train coming! Re:- Rovers v Salford 29/03/09
HFC Boy wrote:Hull FC have not risen to the Challenge of Hull KR .
Success consists of getting up just one more time than you've fallen down.
BalearicHullFan wrote: Either way, it was a very close call. People saying it was a clear cut decision or a "mile forward" are clearly just seeing what they want to see. As are those that say it definetly wasn't.
sorry Balearic if you pause it when hall passes then again when Raynor collects with his arms at full stretch than it is clearly forward no arguments
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
