joetwizzy wrote:whilst in motion, if you pass the ball backwards it may seem to move forward relative to the ground. some people call it the "momentum rule"
edit: just re-watched it and it doesnt even "appear" to go forward
You are full of poop then, watch it on your own Hull FC TV. It goes miles forward, so much so that Raynor has to even stretch out to gather it in
HULL KINGSTON ROVERS is my religion, Craven Park is my church and Jordan Abdull is my God
Joined: Apr 17 2005 Posts: 3469 Location: With Hull's only grade "A" SL club.
MrPhilb wrote:You are full of poop then, watch it on your own Hull FC TV. It goes miles forward, so much so that Raynor has to even stretch out to gather it in
Stop trying to justify yourselves, look, every team wins a game they in no way deserve, Saturday was one of those for you, what goes around comes around, maybe luck will desert you in the play offs.
fcimp wrote:Stop trying to justify yourselves, look, every team wins a game they in no way deserve, Saturday was one of those for you, what goes around comes around, maybe luck will desert you in the play offs.
It was forward, watch it on the HULL FC TV
HULL KINGSTON ROVERS is my religion, Craven Park is my church and Jordan Abdull is my God
Joined: Jun 17 2009 Posts: 1839 Location: West Hull, (enemy territory)
Did you see the pass from burgess to deacon for bradfords 3rd try against celts, looked even more forward than hulls, but it can't of been, it was allowed.
Joined: Sep 23 2006 Posts: 8033 Location: sea level once again
joetwizzy wrote:whilst in motion, if you pass the ball backwards it may seem to move forward relative to the ground. some people call it the "momentum rule"
edit: just re-watched it and it doesnt even "appear" to go forward
Yes, I'm well aware of the principle of relative and true vectors. Given that in either case, forward pass or not, the ball will move forward over the ground kindly tell me how this proves that the pass was not in fact passed forward.
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
joetwizzy wrote:whilst in motion, if you pass the ball backwards it may seem to move forward relative to the ground. some people call it the "momentum rule"
edit: just re-watched it and it doesnt even "appear" to go forward
Christ onafwrakinblak"n"whitebike, I haven't looked on Black & White TV (whatever horror that is), but I'd challenge anyone, and I include cheecky charlie and cabman in that, to explain "the laws of physics" in a worsterer (sic) way than that.
Edit: I admit this marvellous word that I've just invented, needs to be read phonetically. Sorry, I was incredibly provoked.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Joined: Jun 11 2007 Posts: 12260 Location: south of Hull.
Bobbin' Along wrote:Yes, I'm well aware of the principle of relative and true vectors. Given that in either case, forward pass or not, the ball will move forward over the ground kindly tell me how this proves that the pass was not in fact passed forward.
Its simple really.The velocity of Raynor running was quicker than Hall`s swinging momentum of said ball.Ergo,Raynor appeared to arrive ahead of said projectile,when in fact he was still behind it.The conclusion being that Raynor is quicker than the eye.
BLACK AND WHITES
East is East,West is West, and never the twain shall meet.
-------------------------------- "I" said the sparrow "With my bow and arrow."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
