... and was found not guilty.

Keep up?!

If he was found not guilty why does it say charge next to decision?!

on the super league site it says 'no charge for sibbet'.

Are you a WUM, or just a bit slow on the up-take?

I'm merely asking a question, most of the others incidents on the RFL website say no charge, if he's been found not guilty shouldn't it say no charge?

Are you conversationally inept or just rude?

what's a WUM? out of curiosity.

Given the choices available, I'd have to say rude.

Apologies, there are so many WUMs on here that I assumed you were at it too.

Obviously, you just don't know what you're talking about.

Try having another look at the link you posted and perhaps one or two other similar links.

If that doesn't help you, any explanation I could offer will almost certainly be over your head too.

Wind up merchant

Glad it's not just me who didn't know, I'd seen it on here loads before someone explained what is meant?!

Clearly I'm missing something as I've checked the other incidents on the disciplinary page and they all say no charge apart from Tony Clubb which says charge and he has been charged!!

I can see that they're saying no charge for Sibbitt on all the other websites, my question is why?

Don't worry about offering me an explanation, I don't want to prolong my conversation with you!

'no charge' because he didn't do a high tackle..thats why!