Robbie Rotten wrote:I think they will need a big, dominant defender to play alongside Toure.
You're spot on. Toure is not great in the air and is not the most physically imposing.
Quote:Lescott would work really well with Toure,
I think so too. Lescott is a big unit, for a footballer anyway. He would be a good foil for Toure. They both understand the full-back positions, one is left footed, the other right footed, and both are fairly comfortable on the ball and bringing it out of defence.
Kompany is too similar to Toure and Onouha probably needs a further year of experience (he's only 21 and he missed about 2 years because of injury).
We have been linked with Upson and Veloso. No thanks.
Richards needs to lose the bulk and improve his stamina. The lad has a lot of talent. He's still a kid. Last season he was slow and struggled to win the ball in the air. Without those, he is very limited.
Quote:but I really rate Hangeland at Fulham. I may get shot to pieces for this, but if they don't get Lescott, then he'd be a top second option.
I don't rate Hangelaand that highly. Because Fulham's attacking players worked so hard to defend their half, a lot of teams had to resort to simply pumping the ball in the air. Meat and drink to a giant like Hangelaand. IMO that made Hangelaand look far better than he is. He's good in the air, intelligent and a big physical presence but IMO he's not too sharp on the ground.