Jake the Peg wrote:Wish I was, my resignation letter would be on rule's desk 1st thing tomorrow

SaintsFan wrote:No way was that a forward pass.

cheeky charlie wrote:Lets lock this at the end of the day is was a blatant forward pass that is not allowed.

hkrdavidhkr wrote:right for arguments sake, lets say you got that forward pass, you still had a try in the first half that shouldn`t have been, cordoba pushed dobson in the back with two hands which resulted in dobson kneeing the ball dead, the result from this was a goal line drop out when in fact it should of been a penalty as attackers are not allowed to push defenders in that way...... and in the first set from the drop you scored a try......

hkrdavidhkr wrote:you win some you lose some, we can debate decisions till the cows come home but at the end of the day the result will still stand and nothing can be done about it now

aint this sport just brill

Wellsy13 wrote:The key word is "defender". He was playing at the ball by running in front of the attacker and shielding it. Nothing wrong with it.



I aren't debating the result, I'm debating the forward pass decision. Some people are linking the two, but I'm not. It was not a forward pass, end of.

Robbo4 wrote:As has been said many times, the fact the ball may have travelled forward in relation to the pitch does not make it a forward pass.

cheeky charlie wrote:Thankyou Robo you finally admitted it was FORWARD

10-5 wrote:Sir Silverwood says it was and that is all that matters!( by the way,it wasn`t).

Wellsy13 wrote:Another example of how much of an imbecile you continue to prove you are.

Not only does he say "may", but the fact that he also says "in relation to the pitch" afterwards means that you STILL don't understand the rules of the game your "team" play in