j_hunter_hkr wrote:Or 7 league positions better after 1760 minutes of rugby, but if it makes you feel better to look at it your way, you do that :)

Robbo4 wrote:Thanks for proving what I already knew, your talking cack.

If your being honest you know full well it wasn't forward and you know in both derbies this season you have been hanging on for the win. Fair play for getting them both and being a full 10 points better than us over the course of 160 minutes of rugby.

barham red wrote:and on that logic Bradford are better than Leeds and Salford are better than saints....

Robbo4 wrote:After the amazing dummy spit by your coach earlier in the season with regards to Thaler and the reaction of most of you on here I'm amazed you had the cheek to post this

hamiltonsaint wrote:dignified in defeat.

Robbo4 wrote:You were outplayed for most of the game. The decision was a turning point but who knows what would have happened if it had been given. You may well have won anyway. To claim it was forward shows just how biased you are.

Alphabetti Spaghetti Go! wrote:This statement finally proves you know absolutely nothing about RL.

Having the better of 1 half of a game does not constitute "outplaying" your opponent. Watch it again (if you can bear to) and come back on here to back up that crap.

Alphabetti Spaghetti Go! wrote:This statement finally proves you know absolutely nothing about RL.

Having the better of 1 half of a game does not constitute "outplaying" your opponent. Watch it again (if you can bear to) and come back on here to back up that crap.

j_hunter_hkr wrote:It's funny isn't it. I've never known a team to be outplayed over 80 minutes yet never go behind on the scoreboard!