poppys mum wrote:Yeah joe westerman 6/6

i8no-one wrote:who cares what that drug cheating south african pr1ck say's. I think its a disgrace that DRUG CHEATS are allowed back into the game to either play or talk crap on the radio.

t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:I don't agree with all that, but I find it ironic he gets a job (and he's one of the poorer summarisers they have, which is quite a feat!) when his employers are quick to slag off Dwain Chambers!

St. Chunter wrote:i listen to radio leeds after match purely for kears interview but why on earth they feel so compelled to repeatedly read out texts from cretins is beyond me. terrible, absolutely terrible programming

t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:Like reading RLFans out...or worse!

Khlav Kalash wrote:More then anything today the performance really disappointed me. The result not so much. One team has to lose and I can accept that. However, that must have been the second poorest performance of the season (Huddersfield at home been the worst).

Trinity quite literary did not turn up. 1 -17 just looked so flat and discipline was terrible. Decision making awful and school errors a plenty. Yes you can make allowances for the conditions but what I saw today was beyond that. It’s almost as if the players thought that because they beat Saints last week all they had to do was turn up. There seemed zero concentration leading to stupid mistakes. Cas were also poor but seemed that little bit more hungrier then Wakefield in both attack and defence.

As bad as they played, they still could’ve won the match, two bombed chances (nailed on had Moore not gone for glory) would seen them undeservedly take the two points. One things for sure, both teams will need to improve 10 fold if they want to stay and compete in the playoffs.

MR BROWN wrote: see how cas go on now they have got some tough opposition to play.

MR BROWN wrote:don't agree with most of that. when you say 1 to 17 i think obst, murphy and 1 or 2 others put in a great effort.most of the time cas came down the field on the backs of penalties. some pretty iffy i thought. if 1 or 2 players had passed the ball instead of going for glory, it could have been a different story. over the last few weeks the lads have given it 150% and i don't think any of them thought that today all they had to do was turn up, that was a stupid thing to say. i am disappointed but its 2 points lost, move on. we all know we are good enough to make the play offs. see how cas go on now they have got some tough opposition to play.

castigers222 wrote:So wakey were easy beats then..... must be the korky influence.......

Birstalltiger wrote:Bring them on the score was flattering for you today your ball attention was sh-te it was wet weather rugby and you did not play it.