General Zod. wrote:Had Briscoe not been injured we'd have put 40 on you - so what?
We are Top-Dogs and that's just the way it is...
And if my Auntie had b*llocks she'd be my Uncle, etc.
You won. There was a bad call, they come and go in RL. I thought we deserved a draw at least but that's life. The decision didn't cost us the game, and I'm glad I saw an excellent game of rugby (even if I couldn't really work out everything that was happening from where I was).
But the whole "we'd have put 40 on you with Briscoe on" thing is really just pointless to continuously bring up, because no-one can prove anything, so we could all just say anything. All I'll say is, Great Britain got beat by Australia with 12 men for the full game bar 10 seconds by 4 points. With that same man on in the next game, they didn't do any better. I personally don't think it would have changed the game as much as you think.