phil webbo wrote:Try watching it again, instead of trying to dish out childish insults, he Stopped, the ball went forward, no amourt of crying on here will change that

phil webbo wrote:The thing is I've watched the game back twice now, and paused my Sky+ just as Hall is about to release the ball, he's one step over the shadow of the stand, which was parallel to the white line on the pitch, then moved it on, and stopped it when raynor recieves it, he's at least 3 steps past the shadow, and as Hall had stopped running, that takes away the momentum rule, if you try doing as I have, you may change your mind, or you may just carry on calling Rovers fans blinkered, but the blinkers will surely be on anyone who carries on spouting off, without taking the time to check.

phil webbo wrote:Doh if he had stopped, how can he have momentum

phil webbo wrote:Doh if he had stopped, how can he have momentum

Wellsy13 wrote:As someone who has completed biomechanics at university recently, I can tell you now that you do not understand what momentum is.

And not only that, but Hall had not stopped running.

I'll say it again... the only way the ball would not have any momentum is if Craig Hall had been stood still during the pass. If you think he was stood still, you are watching a different game.

It is irrelevant whether he stopped after the pass.

Robbo4 wrote:I see that selective reading syndrome has kicked in again. Was I discussing the ability of SL coaches in stopping him scoring at the time? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Wellsy13 wrote:As someone who has completed biomechanics at university recently, I can tell you now that you do not understand what momentum is.

And not only that, but Hall had not stopped running.

I'll say it again... the only way the ball would not have any momentum is if Craig Hall had been stood still during the pass. If you think he was stood still, you are watching a different game.

It is irrelevant whether he stopped after the pass.

hkrdavidhkr wrote:i know what we shall have to start throwing it american football style , because as the way you make it sound is that as long as the player that throws it is in front of a player that catches it then it`s not forward..........

we shall hve to try this one sometime hhhhmmmmm

hkrdavidhkr wrote:i know what we shall have to start throwing it american football style , because as the way you make it sound is that as long as the player that throws it is in front of a player that catches it then it`s not forward..........

we shall hve to try this one sometime hhhhmmmmm