rover49 wrote:As i said, its not about the numbers, its the passion.
By the way, your lowest attendances in SL are below 5k and there are lots of them, we have NEVER had a home SL crowd that low. I will assume you one of the ones who started going after the move to the KC, like you assume my history.
rubbish.
That really is something you've made up to try and make yourselfs look superior.
You don't need to tell me about out Pre KC era I know all about our history and I am fully aware there were games when we were propping up the SL table that only had 3000 there I should know as I was one of em.
Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
pmarrow wrote:rubbish.
That really is something you've made up to try and make yourselfs look superior.
You don't need to tell me about out Pre KC era I know all about our history and I am fully aware there were games when we were propping up the SL table that only had 3000 there I should know as I was one of em.
of course you were , I know 12,000 that were there with you
You had a gate of 4,070 v Hudds when you were 6th in the table, hardly propping it up is it.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
rover49 wrote:of course you were , I know 12,000 that were there with you
You had a gate of 4,070 v Hudds when you were 6th in the table, hardly propping it up is it.
I was there anc can prove it, unlike you who was probably in his armchair watching his 1980 DVD for last 20 years.
I find your last sentence irrelvent, when we were propping up the table we averaged inbetween 3000-4000 with the odd game above that. So I fail to see why you continue to post rubbish ?
Joined: Jan 23 2006 Posts: 15980 Location: Boulevard with my balls of steel!
rover49 wrote:The difference is that most of our fans do not attach conditions to our support, most of yours do, which goes to show we are a lot more passionate about our team, forget numbers, its quality that matters.
Most of your fans (I'm assuming you agree at least 75% equates to most?) were not even attending games 3 years ago. I'd say your fans certainly do "attach conditions" wouldn't you?
Joined: May 09 2009 Posts: 1113 Location: East Hull
Robbo4 wrote::lol:
Most of your fans (I'm assuming you agree at least 75% equates to most?) were not even attending games 3 years ago. I'd say your fans certainly do "attach conditions" wouldn't you?
your really jealous of HULL KR aint you, dont reply, dont bite, rise above Robbo
Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
pmarrow wrote:I was there anc can prove it, unlike you who was probably in his armchair watching his 1980 DVD for last 20 years.
I find your last sentence irrelvent, when we were propping up the table we averaged inbetween 3000-4000 with the odd game above that. So I fail to see why you continue to post rubbish ?
How, do you get sworn statements from other attendees
I dont feel the need to prove anything and I dont have a copy of the 1980 final.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
, I know 12,000 that were there with you
