correct

If the judge had of jailed cooke instead of giving him a suspended senetence we'd have won all of the derbies since you were promoted

Oh my God. They've progressed from being ripped off by the ref to being stitched up by the legal system.

[/b][/quote]


I think your confusing a statement of fact for something else but each to their own.
Regardless of talking points the result is now fish and chip paper.

I think your confusing a statement of fact for something else but each to their own.
Regardless of talking points the result is now fish and chip paper.[/quote]

Ile back you up slightly here Rob, if i may?

Impartiality does not come into it, Hes the Rovers commentator, specialising in just that, hes also a fan, therefore he shows hes elation and happiness when we get a result, so he should.

Ile back you up slightly here Rob, if i may?

Impartiality does not come into it, Hes the Rovers commentator, specialising in just that, hes also a fan, therefore he shows hes elation and happiness when we get a result, so he should.[/quote]

What about Gwilym then ?

The ball is allowed to travel forward provided it comes out of the hands in a backward motion.

It did both so the try should have stood of that there is no doubt.

Correct, and incorrect!

Anyone claiming that was a forward pass is taking Rovers blinkerdness (is that even a word?) to a whole new level. I'm 99% certain that nobody is THAT thick so I'm assuming it is a trolling attempt? (the 1% factor comes into play when taking into account some of the complete rubbish spouted by the 3 posters on this thread who think it was forward)

Camera angles are deceptive regarding forward passes.

I can tell you the pass was forward, even taking into account the momentum rule.

I can also tell you to expect more Rovers domination of the city next season.