Joined: Apr 06 2006 Posts: 1103 Location: The Heart of East Hull
GraftonRed wrote:I can understand Hull fans going on about our stadium as they've got nothing else better to go on about.That said.....
....when i pay to watch rovers, thats exactly what i pay for...to WATCH rovers.I WATCH them a craven park...i WATCH them at brewery field...i WATCH them at JJB....i WATCH them at knowsley road...i WATCH them at the KC...i WATCH them..............well i couldn't give a t0$$ if i watched them on east park. I watched them at leeds last week knowing i was going to get a soaking, thats part of the fun...if all clubs in the perfect world of the RFL where the same, knowing week in week out i was going to be sitting in a shiney all seater sterile football stadium or the like is not what i call part of the experience. I do not pay my sky subscription to look at a stadium, i pay it to watch the rugby played on the turf, some of the best rugby in the world (australia) is played in worse surroundings than we have. Lets just say for instance, "i'll use hull as an example and wakefield" that for the next 2 seasons wakefield finish in the top 4-8 and play good rugby and hull continue to play the dross they are at the moment and finish 2nd 3rd from bottom, who should be at more risk of loseing their licence?I know i'd rather watch a team playing good rugby in a sh!te hole than a team playing dross in a sterile stadium.
GraftonRed wrote:I can understand Hull fans going on about our stadium as they've got nothing else better to go on about.That said.....
....when i pay to watch rovers, thats exactly what i pay for...to WATCH rovers.I WATCH them a craven park...i WATCH them at brewery field...i WATCH them at JJB....i WATCH them at knowsley road...i WATCH them at the KC...i WATCH them..............well i couldn't give a t0$$ if i watched them on east park. I watched them at leeds last week knowing i was going to get a soaking, thats part of the fun...if all clubs in the perfect world of the RFL where the same, knowing week in week out i was going to be sitting in a shiney all seater sterile football stadium or the like is not what i call part of the experience. I do not pay my sky subscription to look at a stadium, i pay it to watch the rugby played on the turf, some of the best rugby in the world (australia) is played in worse surroundings than we have. Lets just say for instance, "i'll use hull as an example and wakefield" that for the next 2 seasons wakefield finish in the top 4-8 and play good rugby and hull continue to play the dross they are at the moment and finish 2nd 3rd from bottom, who should be at more risk of loseing their licence?I know i'd rather watch a team playing good rugby in a sh!te hole than a team playing dross in a sterile stadium.
[quote="GraftonRed"]I can understand Hull fans going on about our stadium as they've got nothing else better to go on about.That said.....
....when i pay to watch rovers, thats exactly what i pay for...to WATCH rovers.I WATCH them a craven park...i WATCH them at brewery field...i WATCH them at JJB....i WATCH them at knowsley road...i WATCH them at the KC...i WATCH them..............well i couldn't give a t0$$ if i watched them on east park. I watched them at leeds last week knowing i was going to get a soaking, thats part of the fun...if all clubs in the perfect world of the RFL where the same, knowing week in week out i was going to be sitting in a shiney all seater sterile football stadium or the like is not what i call part of the experience. I do not pay my sky subscription to look at a stadium, i pay it to watch the rugby played on the turf, some of the best rugby in the world (australia) is played in worse surroundings than we have. Lets just say for instance, "i'll use hull as an example and wakefield" that for the next 2 seasons wakefield finish in the top 4-8 and play good rugby and hull continue to play the dross they are at the moment and finish 2nd 3rd from bottom, who should be at more risk of loseing their licence?I know i'd rather watch a team playing good rugby in a sh!te hole than a team playing dross in a sterile stadium.
Think your missing the point mate. I couldnt care less how poop your ground is, but I want to be able to SEE the game, and unfortunately from the south stand at cp, you cannot SEE the game. I will be at craven park on saturday because as you say, it's about supporting your team regardless of the venue, but I can understand many Hull fans who refuse to go to your ground because the view is absolutely appauling.
[quote="GraftonRed"]I can understand Hull fans going on about our stadium as they've got nothing else better to go on about.That said.....
....when i pay to watch rovers, thats exactly what i pay for...to WATCH rovers.I WATCH them a craven park...i WATCH them at brewery field...i WATCH them at JJB....i WATCH them at knowsley road...i WATCH them at the KC...i WATCH them..............well i couldn't give a t0$$ if i watched them on east park. I watched them at leeds last week knowing i was going to get a soaking, thats part of the fun...if all clubs in the perfect world of the RFL where the same, knowing week in week out i was going to be sitting in a shiney all seater sterile football stadium or the like is not what i call part of the experience. I do not pay my sky subscription to look at a stadium, i pay it to watch the rugby played on the turf, some of the best rugby in the world (australia) is played in worse surroundings than we have. Lets just say for instance, "i'll use hull as an example and wakefield" that for the next 2 seasons wakefield finish in the top 4-8 and play good rugby and hull continue to play the dross they are at the moment and finish 2nd 3rd from bottom, who should be at more risk of loseing their licence?I know i'd rather watch a team playing good rugby in a sh!te hole than a team playing dross in a sterile stadium.
Think your missing the point mate. I couldnt care less how poop your ground is, but I want to be able to SEE the game, and unfortunately from the south stand at cp, you cannot SEE the game. I will be at craven park on saturday because as you say, it's about supporting your team regardless of the venue, but I can understand many Hull fans who refuse to go to your ground because the view is absolutely appauling.
Joined: Jan 27 2004 Posts: 7005 Location: Super League
TKOAH wrote:I'll ask an easier one for you, they paid their bill with Kooga yet?
When companies are put on hold by their suppliers it usually means that the suppliers will not release anymore goods until all monies have been paid...
http://www.hullkr.co.uk/article.php?id=346
TKOAH wrote:I'll ask an easier one for you, they paid their bill with Kooga yet?
When companies are put on hold by their suppliers it usually means that the suppliers will not release anymore goods until all monies have been paid...
http://www.hullkr.co.uk/article.php?id=346
Joined: Nov 01 2006 Posts: 12741 Location: Walking in a Pearson wonderland
EAST HULL RED wrote:When companies are put on hold by their suppliers it usually means that the suppliers will not release anymore goods until all monies have been paid... http://www.hullkr.co.uk/article.php?id=346
Club Rovers 2010 did it's job then.
EAST HULL RED wrote:When companies are put on hold by their suppliers it usually means that the suppliers will not release anymore goods until all monies have been paid... http://www.hullkr.co.uk/article.php?id=346
Club Rovers 2010 did it's job then.
Big Dave T wrote:It's safe to say you'd be better believing TKOAH!
Stan Butler wrote:And the next one to be TKO(H)'d.......
Rufus Robin wrote:we share the city with an admittedly bigger club
All Derby matches: Played 214; Hull won 106; Rovers won 98; Draw 10
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
