What is it with people who haven't got this kind of backing themselves that they suddenly want to look after us and point out that we need to be careful, we need to keep our feet on the ground, we willl end up doing a 'Leeds' etc?
I'm touched by their concern, no matter how deep rooted in jealousy it is, but if you are asking me whether I want to see another thirty years of self-financing, non-achievement or take a risk on it all going bottoms up after a few years of trophies then I'd take the latter anytime.
I'd rather us have ten years of being up there at the top before 'doing a Leeds' (albeit with trophies first) than ten years of 'doing an Aston Villa or Everton' followed by another twenty years of 'doing an Aston Villa or Everton'
I love the way you still think people are jealous, especially those at the top. Those who have been 'up there' as you put for many years with a history of trophies and being in major finals. I'm sure they are running scared.
And to say you would like to be 'up there' for ten years and then have it all go tiits up is just bizarre, i'll keep us where we are for many years and continue to develop and break into the big time when we are ready to sustain for a long time, not just dip in and then fall away, leeds esq.
[quote="Newsom 13"]You're the Ginger Journo Scouser. Not me.[/quote]
[quote="WireFanatic"]Never agree much with a bluenose.......but in this case I will make an exception. ;)[/quote]
You've already done a Leeds anyway by being in the third tier of English football. Are you saying you'd rather have City's next 20 years based on the past than Everton's last 20 years? You're a lil bit crazy if you do.
Leeds did a City, thank you.
I know exactly where Dave is coming from. Supporting City is far more entertaining than supporting Everton. You lot have virtually worn in a groove in mid-table.
I'd rather feel "I would like us to avoid relegation this year" or "Hopefully we will get promoted this season" than "I really hope we cement our midtable slot this season"
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
Enfield Exile wrote:You're obviously in a bad mood, or humourless.
Anyway, I still think it is an appropriate analogy. There are probably better analogies, but it will do.
No, I just didn't realise you were (or have have been) trying to be funny, and personally think you often talk diversionary rubbish bordering on propaganda rather than discuss issues involving Manchester City properly. LGJM was quite capable of responding seriously.
Enfield Exile wrote:When referring to our owner in a negative way, the press and a lot of fans of opposition clubs, would often refer to him as "an Arab" or "the Arads". rarely do they refer to him by his name. Would that happen if he was English.
I also happen to believe that the press and some non-Chelsea fans were racist towards Abrahimovich.
Would that be because many simply don't know his name? I've not heard of Al Fayed being anonymised.
And how about people referring to Mike Ashley's 'Geordie Mafia', or does that not fit with your 'poor ickle rich Man City owner' theory?
Joined: Nov 23 2007 Posts: 2351 Location: Newton-le-willows(Up The Vista)
Enfield Exile wrote:Leeds did a City, thank you.
I know exactly where Dave is coming from. Supporting City is far more entertaining than supporting Everton. You lot have virtually worn in a groove in mid-table.
I'd rather feel "I would like us to avoid relegation this year" or "Hopefully we will get promoted this season" than "I really hope we cement our midtable slot this season"
Everton in the past five seasons have recorded four top six finishes. Have been fifth the past two seasons and sixth the year before that not to mention breaking the top four monopoly in 05. Hardly a mid-table groove Dipsh!t.
Joined: May 10 2002 Posts: 47951 Location: Die Metropole
carl_spackler wrote:Genuine question here for fans of any club with a modern fairy-godfather:
Whilst it's all well and good that the owner's are so rich that frittering away huge sums on players doesn't matter to them, do none of you ever consider the fact that the club are still not necessarily rich? Obviously so long as the backer stays this is of no concern, but what if they eventually get bored? The club will more than likely still end up in considerable amounts of debt, just to an individual instead. Is it simply a case of just praying that they never leave, or if they do that they choose to write off the debt?
I'd rather have that than have a shît like Peter Swales, who left us pretty much high and dry, having ripped off the club for years (we had no control over merchandise – no copyright on the badge, for instance; the club shop wasn't even a franchise ...)
And to echo what EE has said: on the basis of statements from the current owners, they're in it for at least 10 years (they've stated that this is a 10-year project), they're investing more in the academy and they're not taking the pîss on ticket prices (as I said previously, season tickets have fallen in price for 2009/10). For the moment at least, I feel as though the current management is making more of an effort to make me feel part of my club than any of their predecessors. That might seem strange, but it's little things like the banners on the stadium last season with every season ticket holder's name on them; the project to record fans' memories of their first City match etc.
Yes, it could go pear-shaped. We're City, after all. But at present, I feel optimistic in a way I have not for years – and pleased that we seem to be increasingly behaving professionally on and off the pitch.
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller
"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde
carl_spackler wrote:And how about people referring to Mike Ashley's 'Geordie Mafia', or does that not fit with your 'poor ickle rich Man City owner' theory?
Cockney mafia. And it was the geordies who were complaining about that so it was different.
Quote:Would that be because many simply don't know his name? I've not heard of Al Fayed being anonymised.
I think that is partly the case, but it's still fairly puzzling that his name isn't well known when he's spent nearly 500m(?).
I know exactly where Dave is coming from. Supporting City is far more entertaining than supporting Everton. You lot have virtually worn in a groove in mid-table.
I'd rather feel "I would like us to avoid relegation this year" or "Hopefully we will get promoted this season" than "I really hope we cement our midtable slot this season"
What a crock of poop, as Maca rightly points out below:
St_Maca wrote:Everton in the past five seasons have recorded four top six finishes. Have been fifth the past two seasons and sixth the year before that not to mention breaking the top four monopoly in 05. Hardly a mid-table groove Dipsh!t.
Add to that the round of 32 in UEFA Cup, a semi final of the league cup and an FA Cup final appearance too. And what have City actually done to make your season more entertaining than ours? finishing where last season? [/i]
[quote="Newsom 13"]You're the Ginger Journo Scouser. Not me.[/quote]
[quote="WireFanatic"]Never agree much with a bluenose.......but in this case I will make an exception. ;)[/quote]
Mintball wrote:I'd rather have that than have a shît like Peter Swales, who left us pretty much high and dry, having ripped off the club for years (we had no control over merchandise – no copyright on the badge, for instance; the club shop wasn't even a franchise ...)
That's one of the huge weaknesses when people try and argue for English ownership. It's alright having English ownership when they are the unknown billionaires like at Arsenal, or the famous pools billionaires at Liverpool, but they were few and far between.
I liked Ken Bates. Still do TBH. But there was far more question marks surrounding Ken Bates than there are over Abramovich.
Just a short list of some magnificent English owners - Swales, Bates, Ashley, Frannie Lee, that fool at Crystal Palace, Ridsdale. Of course anyone is going to be delighted when a Russian or Arab billionaire comes in when that's the level of English owners they've been used to.
Dan_FC wrote:Add to that the round of 32 in UEFA Cup, a semi final of the league cup and an FA Cup final appearance too. And what have City actually done to make your season more entertaining than ours? finishing where last season?
Everton have had 5 years of solid achievement. They are the top team when discounting the top 4.
But TBH there is something boring about that. The prospect of you actually cracking the top 4 looks very slim. Even when you went a goal up in the first minute of the FA Cup final, it never looked likely that you'd actually win it.
Citeh are actually interesting. There's a huge question over whether they will be successful, at what cost, or whether they will crash and burn in a hilarious fashion. United, Liverpool and Chelsea will be looking at Citeh and thinking, "Come on then, show us what you can do" in a way that they simply won't with Everton.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum