Standee wrote:Not taking the advice of an immigration specialist.
Not having conditions in the contract about only paying minimal amounts.
Not deciding, when it became clear it was getting protracted, to let him play for someone over there to keep fit.
Not monitoring his fitness whilst he was waiting to come over.
Not arranging for him to train with a professional side whilst waiting to come over.
Not making him fly over AS SOON AS HIS VISA was granted.
Signing him in the first place.
1. Give you that, especially following the Crocker fiasco.
2. How do you know there weren't? I have no idea if he was paid his full wage or a nominal fee.
3. Judgment call. Balancing the risk of injury against fitness, with no clear idea how long the delay would be. Easy choice in hindsight, not so much at the time.
4. My guess would be that up until he injured his hand he was probably keeping as fit as could be expected without playing.
5. They may have tried and failed? Wouldn't necessarily be that easy to arrange, and again they wouldn't have known how long the delay was.
6. He flew as soon as he had the documents to do so.
7. Eh? He's just the kind of player we need.
My take on it is that the club are to blame for not taking advice and/or keeping a closer eye on his application. They should have been aware that he was applying on his Tongan passport and that there would be a English test required as a result. They should not have assumed that his time spent in NZ would bypass this requirement - they should have made damn sure that they
knew for certain. OK, so I understand that there are now better checks in place for future applications, but it look like we learned nothing from the Crocker experience at all. And as far as I know we still aren't using an expert for guidance/assistance, which is just plain daft.
Otherwise I don't see that we could have done much else with the information available at the time as things played out.