http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... ences.html Tells of Salford, Celtic, Saints, Castleford and Wakefield being warned about their stadiums not being up to scratch. I'm not complaining that we havent been warned, but our stadium is on the same par if not worse than all of the stadium's listed above. Where is our warning?

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... ences.html Tells of Salford, Celtic, Saints, Castleford and Wakefield being warned about their stadiums not being up to scratch. I'm not complaining that we havent been warned, but our stadium is on the same par if not worse than all of the stadium's listed above. Where is our warning?

It's not a bad stadium, it just has the worst stand in SL and the reason the club havn't been warned aswell is because Rovers are doing something about the stadium. Putting plans into action.

Probably because we have a realistic plan for upgrading. All the above only have plans for a brand new stadium, it may never happen for some or most.

Would have been very strange after being voted Super League club of the season 2008.

Have you been to the grounds mentioned ?

Apart from Celtic I have and I enjoy visiting all of them, much more than some of these newer stadiums.

what was wrong with celtic, i enjoyed it!

Saints - haven't been but looks a bit small on TV
Celtic - never went, but similar to above
Wakefield - Shocking ground IMO, bottlenecked turnstiles, and lack of walkway for spectators.
Salford - haven't been, but will be this year (was on holiday when they played last time.)
Castleford - worst gorund of the lot, people say Craven park is a dump but I think its far better than the jungle. It helps to see all of the sticks when you're at a ground ya kno lol

Sorry pal, I aint been.