Scott_HKR wrote::roll:

Big Dave T wrote:Was one of your fans that told my mate. Was the same bloke who told him he was talking to one of your directors in france and he was saying Dobson was average and no better further fueling the speculation. He posts on here sometimes.

rover49 wrote:I agree, why would we want him and how would he fit in. TBH, I don't see why a hooker cannot do 80 mins, we don't need to interchange hookers, yes its handy to have a player on the bench who can play their from a utility position (like Fitzy or BenC), but I don't think we need to specifically sign a hooker (unless we are getting rid of Fish).

If we ended up with Brough(a scrum half who has played hooker), would he be happy being a bit part player to Dobbo and Fish.

Personally, I would get Fitzy to stay if the quota can stand it, he is a good player and I reckon if he was used as first choice hooker and played for 80 mins you would see a whole different side in attack.

Big Dave T wrote:Was one of your fans that told my mate.

Big Dave T wrote:To replace Dobson who is Wigan bound. Cash plus Ainscough.

Alex Mc wrote:2 problems. he cant pass or tackle.

Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:Spinning that line on here as well as Facebook eh

reddan wrote:Must be true then

Andyhullofalad wrote:I'de be happy with that

Barky wrote:Disagree. He's one of our in-form players at the minute as well IMO. Three tries in three games I think too? Showing good signs towards the end of the season is promising.