rover49 wrote:I agree, why would we want him and how would he fit in. TBH, I don't see why a hooker cannot do 80 mins, we don't need to interchange hookers, yes its handy to have a player on the bench who can play their from a utility position (like Fitzy or BenC), but I don't think we need to specifically sign a hooker (unless we are getting rid of Fish).
If we ended up with Brough(a scrum half who has played hooker), would he be happy being a bit part player to Dobbo and Fish.
Personally, I would get Fitzy to stay if the quota can stand it, he is a good player and I reckon if he was used as first choice hooker and played for 80 mins you would see a whole different side in attack.
2 problems. he cant pass or tackle.
