A big difference to my Barrow -4 mark.
The problems I have though are,the weather,the depletion of the Barrow side and the apparent upsurge in Widnes form,so rather play safe than be sorry.
Loks like LBIG i a bit touchy.Bet with your brain,not your heart.Everybody could see that the handicap was wrong,should have been 6-8 imo,but most people went on Saints getting beat at Salford (totally ignoring their previous 16 aay results) and that Long and Cunningham were'nt playing,thinking that Roby and Eastmond were not upto superleague or more importantly St Helens standard.
Joined: Jun 25 2006 Posts: 14174 Location: Forum21
Les Boyd Is God wrote:money money money if your that obsessed with money either work for it or bet on another match....seems to me your glad we got beat
I put £40 at evens on Saints at -4 with Bet365 as it was just too good to miss. I still cheered on Warrington and, of course, would have preferred a win, it's a bit like an insurance policy really. Fair enough if you don't wish to bet against Wire but each to their own.
Joined: Feb 07 2005 Posts: 8642 Location: Home sweet home
Live Wired wrote:Loks like LBIG i a bit touchy.Bet with your brain,not your heart.Everybody could see that the handicap was wrong,should have been 6-8 imo,but most people went on Saints getting beat at Salford (totally ignoring their previous 16 aay results) and that Long and Cunningham were'nt playing,thinking that Roby and Eastmond were not upto superleague or more importantly St Helens standard.
far from touchy just dont get people who back against there own team...each to there own but i would never do it and im not on my own
Joined: Oct 10 2006 Posts: 861 Location: sunny spain
Live Wired wrote:Loks like LBIG i a bit touchy.Bet with your brain,not your heart.Everybody could see that the handicap was wrong,should have been 6-8 imo,but most people went on Saints getting beat at Salford (totally ignoring their previous 16 aay results) and that Long and Cunningham were'nt playing,thinking that Roby and Eastmond were not upto superleague or more importantly St Helens standard.
I bet with my heart last night and look where that got me ... Wire + and Bisping... Both losers ... But i did back St George -6 plus KR -4 and Kaymer in his 2 ball so a nice day at the office today...
A big difference to my Barrow -4 mark. The problems I have though are,the weather,the depletion of the Barrow side and the apparent upsurge in Widnes form,so rather play safe than be sorry.
Gone for Barrow outright using the money I made from betting Hudds would win from -2 handicap. Think they have enough to do Widnes over despite the absence of Ned Catich and Jamie Rooney.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
