Agreed. Maybe with Makali likely to go, Clint will be used as a prop, hence the reason we are looking at back rowers??

Hope not

My thoughts too.

Don't see the sense in using one of your best strike players at prop. Also i think Makali will stay with Rovers.

Oh dear, you're enticing Bandontknow on to this thread now!

We're also looking at another back rower by the way

I thought of Lovegrove and Netherton as primarily 2nd rowers, at the start of the season, but they have to a greater or lesser extent played as props. So even if one or both get new contracts, there may be a need for a new back rower - especially if Gene calls it quits.

On the other hand Walker will play in the back row next year, I assume, and Taylor sounds like he has a lot of promise. So unless Murrell starts spending a significant amount of time at hooker, we'd surely only need to bring one in.

In yesterdays League Weekly Justin says he would like Stan to stay another season, but its too early for the club or the player to enter into talks about a new contract just yet. I hope he stays for one more season.

I'm sorry I have to disagree; I thought this season was a season too far; another would be taking the proverbial. I hope we find Stan a coaching role.

newts would be wasted at prop.....its a hooker we need and not someone who can just fill in

Fully agree that Clint is wasted at prop. Been quite noticeable the games he has had less impact is when he has been playing prop.I have said a few times lets give Liam Watts some game time even if it is from the bench IMO he is better now than Mills will ever be.