Last Son of Wigan wrote:But yet you expected myself to justify a point thats been over and done with 2 weeks back cos you can't be arsed flickin back through the pages? who the hell do you think you are?
Secondly, do you think Wigan could get Orford for the same price as Long? NO, obviously not.
So how do you expect to have both Orford and Myler under the same CAP? wake up, Myler himself isn't going to be cheap looking at his demand.
Long and Myler-split backs, develop the Myler/Tomkins partnership over 2 years under Longs supervision bring Sam off the bench and often starting.
I can't believe I'm even bothering re-explaining this considering Long has now signed for Hull.
But anytime you wanna have a pop, let me know and I'll happily rip you and your lame arguments to pieces.
I do not want to sign both Orford and Myler, I have never said this, It's you who wants both Long and Myler, I was just asking why you wouldn't want Orford instead as I beleive him to be the better player. That is all. I understand your point and it's not a bad one by any means, the only thing is I was confused because of the whole Orford, Long thing.
Look at it this way, Orford is now a much better option than Long and we should be in for him.
Im not having a pop, I was discussing things with you, something which is quite a good argument, between Long and Orford. You can rip my arguments to pieces if you wish, if it gives you some sort of kick, but like someone else said you have a chip on your shoulder.
My argument is hardly lame as well, however your predictable approach is, me and clearly a few others on here find it laughable.
Just for the record, we are on RLfans not on question time. You don't have to be so defencive about your party.
That's what I think made him stay with them.
