Quote ="FearTheVee"Sculthorpe was excellent in a GB shirt.
Wasn't Sinfield at 13 when we won 44-0 in the second test? The tests were a lot closer with SoL at 13, so if you're using that series a reason for SoL being a better option than Sinfield then it's a strange argument.'"
I'm not saying he wasn't a good player for GB, I'm just saying that the ball handling loose is not the type we need for the test matches.
Sinfield started the game at 13, he played about 40 mins and he had a shocker and was consequently dropped for the final test. S O'L was far superior to Sinfield in the second Test at LF, I don't see how it's strange at all.