Joined: Oct 15 2003 Posts: 53839 Location: North Yorkshire
The Hollywood Frasier wrote:I dont think he will in all honesty, the fact he i would assume wanted Radford to get a new deal was a shocking decision. It would be different if we needed to release players to get under the salary cap but we dont. From our current squad i can only see Tony and Moa not been here next season.
There could 6/7 coming in so we will have to get rid of a few. Everyone has an opinion about who they would like to see go so Agar's choices won't be fine with all fans but he will be getting shut of players, I am certain of it.
Joined: Sep 06 2005 Posts: 3169 Location: EAST HULL
PAUL M wrote:There could 6/7 coming in so we will have to get rid of a few. Everyone has an opinion about who they would like to see go so Agar's choices won't be fine with all fans but he will be getting shut of players, I am certain of it.
I'm not so sure that Agar is going to have the BIG clearout that we all want. A lot of the OOC players are probably some of the samller earners at the club and the obvious dross that takes up a large chunk of the cap is already contracted for next season.
I have my fingers crossed for a wholesale clearout but aren't going to hold my breath.
Radford, Cusack, Dowes, King, Thorman, Lee, Tony, G Horne can all go for me and anything less than 7 or 8 players leaving will not be nearly enough.
THANK YOU Mr. PEARSON, FOR RIDDING US OF FCKWIT FUBAR, CEO TOOL AND THE STINKING UNCLE KATH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHY DON'T THE DOBBINS PLAY IN GREEN SHIRT, GREEN SHORTS AND GREEN SOCKS IN ORDER TO EXPRESS THEIR INFINITE ENVY OF EVERYTHING BLACK AND WHITE??
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Matty_HullFC wrote:There isn't exactly much more choice though is there?
Who else could have being on the bench against Saints?
Moa, Hall, Broughton, Hodgson
Hardly game changes either are they.
What part of spelling players to avoid exhaustion are you and Agar having difficulty with?
Very few forwards can operate at anything like 100% for 80 minutes. We had players on the pitch who were absolutely bolloxed towards the end of Friday's game and fresh guys sat on the bench. That's just poor.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Joined: Mar 28 2005 Posts: 20992 Location: THE HOME CITY OF LUKE CAMPBELL OLYMPIC GOLD MEDALIST
Kosh wrote:What part of spelling players to avoid exhaustion are you and Agar having difficulty with?
Very few forwards can operate at anything like 100% for 80 minutes. We had players on the pitch who were absolutely bolloxed towards the end of Friday's game and fresh guys sat on the bench. That's just poor.
Prime example being Dowes...he needs a week off if you ask me.....also did anyone notice after Sts last try and 5 mins left he brought Dowes back on...why??????
“We will not accept a top eight finish as a barometer of supposed success at any point in the future whilst I am the owner of this club.
Thats why you got the Bullet Agar...Adam Pearson wants winners...not useless gits like you.
"Rugby League is a simple game played by simple people. Rugby Union is a complex game played by wankers." L.Daley 2005
thehullwhitestar wrote: Radford, Cusack, Dowes, King, Thorman, Lee, Tony, G Horne can all go for me and anything less than 7 or 8 players leaving will not be nearly enough.
Yeah I wouldn't be unhappy to see that lot depart.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
