Yep I'm on that, Hudds have something to prove still.

Also, I've been looking at my betting habits and noticed that it is very rare for me to back a team who are + with the bookies, I almost always back the team who haven't got a start to beat the odds. anybody have any idea how the +/- works in terms of bokkie performance?

I tend to back the likes of Saints/Leeds when they are running hot as they tend to blow out the start with ease. or when they have had a bit of a bad time and need a good performance to get back on track i.e. Leeds v Hull, Saints v Cats in the cup and Hudds v Wakey.

My Acc this week are all - however, I have also gone for Salford at +12.

Time for a bet on the puffball and a bet on the coma-inducing final that is Chelsea v Everton.

Could'nt give a toss who wins and neither do I care for a competition thats well past its sell-buy date.But if Chelsea are supposedly 1 of the top 4 teams in Europe then they should be a lot shorter than 3/4.

Take Everton at 11/2 to win in 90 minutes and if by any chance they've not bored Chelsea to death and scored then have a saver on the draw @ 11/4.

Bit of info on the FA cup final..

* Everton haven't scored against Chelsea for 2 years.
* Both league meetings this season ended 0-0

gone within 25 seconds

todays 3 are

York +14
Widnes -10
Swinton -10

im crap at betting got the important one right tho....i`ll crack it one day

I too took Hudds and if they had managed to hold on the to the ball they would have easily beaten it.

Nice one. Glad to see you in funds again.

I must admit I'm getting edgy over our 8 league points or more bet.

You should be, were can only get better imo.