Not true.

Why?

Yeah and the big sit down protest

What he did was hardly an extraordinary feat and who's to say we wouldn't have done better with anyone else?

Roughly same win/loss ratio as Plange, so the same could be said of him too?

Remember Plange contributed 8 pts during his tenure, PC 4 pts, Anderson 2 pts.

You still haven't told me why I'm wrong. Point is, had we won none out of 6, it was bye bye.

You said "Had he not been appointed we would have been in what was then NL 1, and we may not have got back into SL".

No evidence to suggest we would have been relegated without his appointment. And there is no evidence to suggest we would not have got back into SL if we were, indeed, relegated. That is why you are wrong.

However saying "had we have won none from 6, it was bye bye" is correct.

Profound apologies. I didn't know that I wasn't entitled to an opinion. I bow to your far greater knowledge.

You asked just a couple of posts above "You still haven't told me why I'm wrong"

I answered and explained. Of course you are entitled to an opinion.

In general what many people don't realise is that Plange was probably more instrumental in our surviving in SL by pulling off unlikely wins against Hull FC away and Leeds to name just two. Under Plange we won 8 of our 14 "survival" points.

Also people dont remember that under PC we lost our last 2 games which, if results hadn't been favourable, would have led to relegation.

I just don't get this PC saviour thing.

we did`nt when lowes was in charge