To me he's not an International Centre , winger is his best position and he wouldn't make the NZ team in that position either.

It's good when it comes of but fatal when it doesn't.

chuck him on the wing for this weekend, bet he would do some damage, hes a natural winger anyways not a centre.

hes abit like Matt King in that respect really, same time of player- who would you rather have though?

One of the reasons Webster left the NRL was because he didnt want to be played on the wing.

One "average" game doesnt mean that one of our most consistent players from recent weeks should be moved around..

In my book, tough poop were he wants to play, you play were your coach tells you too.

i agree he shouldnt just be moved about as he has done well recently, i personally just think he could do alot of damage with his size on the wing.

He usually successfully tackles when he does that,
he was off par on sunday.

So could Mick Vella but it doesnt mean we should play himn there.

Saying we did move Webster to the wing.... Who would you put in his place at Centre?

Fozzard

talk about over-reacting!!
I think if you study the video you'll see Jake (and Welham at times) was left a bit short-handed and tried his/their best to cut off the attack--which he has been doing fantastically well of late. He is a much improved player this season and deffo doesn't want sticking out on the wing. The team has to slide as a unit to plug the gaps but now and again it needs a centre or winger to shoot out to stop a threat---not shoot out all the time like Chev or Kris has been doing of late. Jake is still the best centre at the club but we need to give him more running attacking opportunities.

On Chris Hicks try where Jake comes out of the line, you will see that its three of them opposite Chris Welham, the only option was for Jake to race out, but unfortunatly there was a very good cut out pass, if not for that, it would of more than likely stopped the move.