Me too with Cleveland but now that i have looked at it again i think the fans votes count aswell so that may be why they are so high up ?

Maybe so. Should be a B/C.

Detroit at a B is wrong IMO. They took Stafford which was the only logical choice. But then passed on a LT not once, in Oher but twice by passing on Beatty also. Why would you pass on the chance to select the player to protect your million pound investment. They will have to select the top tackle in 2010, no doubt with another top 2-3 pick.

Denver should be lower for selecting a player who doesn't fit the system and trading a first round player for a poor corner. They gave away what IMO will be the number one overall pick next year.

I can see detroit owning that again to be honest they never seem to get any better and i still think oakland will be poor!

I think it'll be close between Denver, Detroit and Kansas City for the number one pick.

I'll go Denver to get number one overall, Kansas City second and Detroit third. All with 3-5 wins.

NFC North: Vikes
NFC South: Bucs
NFC East: Eagles
NFC West: Seahawks
NFC Wildcard 1: Giants
NFC Wildcard 2: Packers

AFC North: Steelers
AFC South: Colts
AFC East: Pats
AFC West: Bolts
AFC Wildcard 1: Texans
AFC Wildcard 2: Jets

AFC Championship Game: Pats v Steelers
NFC Championship Game: Bucs v Vikes

Superbowl: Pats v Vikes = Pats to win

Yeah they should all be there or there abouts but every season there seems to be a "shock" team who finish in the bottom 4 or 5 one that people have tipped to make the playoffs and im not sure the Rams have improved enough to stay away from the bottom end.

Yeah maybe so, kind of like Seattle this year just gone. They are a pretty good team but were decimated by injuries.

I think Jacksonville could be down in the bottom five this year.

Yeah i was thinking somewhere along the lines of them or maybe the Bills

What about the Raiders ?