Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18072 Location: On the road
dally messenger wrote:SL.
Why because it upset the cosy status quo of the Sydney-centric Aussies rugby league?
Few would argue that the quality of the product on the pitch has improved significantly since the switch to full time - lets face it if the sport wants credibility its top players cannot be part time - even RU realised that.
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Eccleshill Rhino wrote:Why because it upset the cosy status quo of the Sydney-centric Aussies rugby league?
Few would argue that the quality of the product on the pitch has improved significantly since the switch to full time - lets face it if the sport wants credibility its top players cannot be part time - even RU realised that.
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18072 Location: On the road
dally messenger wrote:sorry but
But what the arguement above your head
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Saddened wrote:Pat Richards is poop. A typical, average, run of the mill NRL outside back. Nothing special at all. Like Barrett he is a myth. He is solid enough, he can catch, he can kick goals.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 679 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
