Joined: Aug 13 2003 Posts: 20966 Location: The Shaky Isles
manly4ever wrote:there's plenty of nice tities lying on the sand .
and just one big one posting on here then eh
Back on thread
I would suspend them (without pay) for the duration of their legal punishment. In most careers, if you have a record/get a record, you get shown the door, so why different for these numpties.
dally messenger wrote:was watching an nfl doco. on one of their teams and they used the term bomb to describe those long high passes from quaterback to running back and i think gibson took that idea, realized you cant throw the ball forward in RL and adapted it to a "bomb" kick we have
eels fan wrote:You poor poor obsessed fat ex vichyballin potato thieving stoaway.
Joined: Feb 18 2002 Posts: 32302 Location: Swimming against a tide of fekkwittedry
The NFL are clamping down on player behaviour and players who infringe the law are being suspend and have to apply for re-instatement.
There's some merit in this.
Quote:Every player in our squad could probably earn more money with another club. But they prefer to sacrifice a few extra quid in their back pocket to share special memories. And playing at a place like Old Trafford on a night like this makes it all worthwhile.
Joined: Mar 12 2009 Posts: 752 Location: Coventry previously South Wales and Plymouth
i'd say if your found guilty it should be suspended without pay. for the duration of the sentence and then a standard 6 league game ban after that. how is it fair that guys can get custodial/ suspended sentences etc and not be banned by the clubs and yet if you test positive for gear you get 2 years.
It sets a bad tone that you can get found guilty of doping and not get a criminal conviction but serve a lengthy ban but you can bring the game into disrepute and be let off
Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
Saddened! wrote:Each act should be taken on it's own individual grounds and a view taken on that. Cockayne's was a very serious crime and KR's response is fine by me.
Pryce's was absolutely nothing so didn't warrant any action at all by the club, the warning comes because it's not the first time he's got into trouble. Those getting all sanctimonious about his 'crime' need to get outside more and breath in a few times.
Reardon was cut by Wire as an excuse for how poor he is as a player and the poorness of his injury record. If they had Pryce they, nor Hull KR would have taken the action they did.
By the courts, yes. The RFL should not then take this into account as a secondary punishment, they should have a punishment that fits all, if you are convicted in a court of law for a criminal offence you should not be allowed to be involved in the game for xxxxx months.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 757 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
