Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 9721 Location: Cougarville
I'll make a suggestion that if both Wakey and Cas don't share and if Salford don't get cracking then there at least 4 clubs with better gounds and reasons to get into in sooperdooper league.
The clock is ticking and if what I read is correct ( it's from the RFL so may be open to change ) promises mean sweet FA when the franchises come round again in March 2011
If however Wakey/Cas can get the cash AND the planning permision without the aid of the council then fine, however being realistic, honest and applying common sense is it gonna happen?
The Bull sports village ( pipedream plus for people of Keighley to fund) has more chance and they are struggling even after the council basically gave them Odsal!
Salford may just get in in time but......................
Crusaders as well.
And as for the mighty Cougars, the chances of a decent SL ground and application are a long way away but you never know, it could end up with the Bulls down at our gaff if they go down the pan (unlikely but you never know)
regards
and ENJOY your sport
Leaguefan
"The Public wants what the Public gets" - Paul Weller
Post subject: Re: The great race - who'll get their stadium built 1st
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 3:36 pm
Alice's Phallus
Player Coach
Joined: Aug 07 2007 Posts: 792 Location: Wood Green
Disco wrote:So you're suggesting it's logical that Castleford should abandon the years of work they've put in to the Glasshoughton project, walk away from the stadium and from Waystone at the 11th hour, just so they can get into bed with Wakefield and their latest pipe dream?
It's about as logical as believing you can build a stadium on green belt land with no plans, no permission and no money. Oh, hang on...
Joined: Feb 22 2007 Posts: 3414 Location: Doha, Qatar - Home of the 2022 World Cup and now relocated to the M62 corridor
andyed-wiganrl wrote:Personally if your honest Cas's ground is as much a dream as wakeys as things stand.
Joint ground..15/16k capacity..two stands apiece named after each club ...two stands amber and black on the castleford side of the ground...two stands red and blue on the side of the ground facing wakefield.....would really make the griund unique IMO!!!
In affect you could have a castleford side and a wakey side to build up the intensity of the derby games, and for home games for each team...open 'their' respective 2 home stands, with the other teams stand housing away fans, and one stand closed. would work perfectly for both teams IMO, with the capacity of the ground being approximately 11/12k for normal home games with one end shut...and 15/16k for the derbys.
Both clubs have an end terrace, keep with history 'The Belle View Terrace' and the 'Wheldon End' etc and one after a notable player....ie. The John Joyner Stand facing the Don Fox Stand etc.
This could also promote extra interest in both clubs IMO and would be a new ground, but a new ground with real character and history almost given to it overnight....something the modern grounds lack completely IMO.
Realistically, I think this is the only way either will get a ground and makes sence on so many levels. I also honestly think this is the only way both clubs can possibly remain in superleague. Otherwise I see both denied franchises and playing out their days in NL1, or Joining to become 'Calder' a thought that neither fan would like.
A joint venture and ground is the only sensible option IMO.
Complete and total common sense mate, thats why it will probably never happen.
Fat blokes in the mud, flat caps, bogs that drain pi55 directly onto your boots - Now it's all 'Big Ask', 'Arm Wrestle', 'Collision' 'Contact' 'Facials' 'Upper Body Strength' 'Big Units' 'Scooting from Dummy Half' 'Energy Levels' 'Laying the Platform' ‘Middles’ and 'T-R-Y'. Let’s not forget resilience.
Joined: Mar 08 2002 Posts: 4799 Location: Now the Man from Oswestry.
Given the current economic climate, I'm wondering whether the RFL will quietly drop the ground standards section from the licence renewal requirements.
Freedom for supporters of the government, only for members of one party - however numerous they may be - is no freedom at all. freedom is always and exclusively for one who thinks differently. Rosa Luxemburg, 'Die russiche Revolution'.
Joined: Aug 18 2002 Posts: 18789 Location: 'Fax fan in Stockport: The jewel in the ring of Manchester
The Chronicler of Chiswic wrote:Given the current economic climate, I'm wondering whether the RFL will quietly drop the ground standards section from the licence renewal requirements.
Junior development costs too. Drop that also? Unemploment hits hardest in the North usually - so scrap the expansion policy in favour of admitting a club in an economically deprived area (Widnes) ?
Anyway, the news about the recession will filter through to the RFL in about 2011.
Joined: Mar 09 2004 Posts: 33944 Location: watching out for low flying geese
The Chronicler of Chiswic wrote:Given the current economic climate, I'm wondering whether the RFL will quietly drop the ground standards section from the licence renewal requirements.
Most likely yes
As Leigh now have the use of the most modern RL stadium in this country that part of the criteria will be dropped
We are a very lucky club
kcab sfrawdder
Luck is a combination of preparation and opportunity
Just to avoid confusion Starbug is the username of Steven Pike
SOMEBODY SAID that it couldn’t be done But he with a chuckle replied That “maybe it couldn’t,” but he would be one Who wouldn’t say so till he’d tried. So he buckled right in with the trace of a grin On his face. If he worried he hid it. He started to sing as he tackled the thing That couldn’t be done, and he did it!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 700 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
