Everyone is entitled to their opinion but negative comments don't help!!!!
I'm not a sheep
I've watched Hull through thick and thin and get frustrated by many things - I'm sure players will read some of these messages on here.
Calderwood played good - and we see to be seeing Richard Horne of old or the first signs - lets kick on from this and get behind our team. Hopefully the Visa situation will get sorted soon and its looking better. At least we go to work on Monday not having to defend another loss!!!!
Opinions are permitted on a chat forum, both positive and negative. There are some positives to come out of our performance tonight. We still look a shadow of the team we should be and those not willing to accept the reality because it seems 'negative' need a little reality check i think.
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
UllFC wrote:only because Hall wasn't there to cough up possession!
can't believe people watched the game and found it an improvement, they nearly through it away with that final scrum as well!
I'm watching it again now, and apart from the diabolical start where we let them score two tries through some shambolic play it WAS an improvement. Not much of one, granted, but improvement nonetheless.
We at least attempted to play with more width, and actually succeeded on many occasions. Our tries were well worked and we actually had players in motion and dummy runners.
In the second half we went into our shells and reverted to more of the 5 drives and a kick stuff we know and love.
Don't get me wrong - there is still plenty of improvement required. but I think we made a first, small, faltering step in the right direction tonight.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Joined: Jan 02 2003 Posts: 43413 Location: rlfans flying wing man
Kosh wrote:I'm watching it again now, and apart from the diabolical start where we let them score two tries through some shambolic play it WAS an improvement. Not much of one, granted, but improvement nonetheless.
We at least attempted to play with more width, and actually succeeded on many occasions. Our tries were well worked and we actually had players in motion and dummy runners.
In the second half we went into our shells and reverted to more of the 5 drives and a kick stuff we know and love.
Don't get me wrong - there is still plenty of improvement required. but I think we made a first, small, faltering step in the right direction tonight.
Joined: Apr 27 2007 Posts: 8157 Location: Back in Hull
Kosh wrote:I'm watching it again now, and apart from the diabolical start where we let them score two tries through some shambolic play it WAS an improvement. Not much of one, granted, but improvement nonetheless.
We at least attempted to play with more width, and actually succeeded on many occasions. Our tries were well worked and we actually had players in motion and dummy runners.
In the second half we went into our shells and reverted to more of the 5 drives and a kick stuff we know and love.
Don't get me wrong - there is still plenty of improvement required. but I think we made a first, small, faltering step in the right direction tonight.
Pretty much waht we did in the first 5 take a lead and try defend it instead of kicking on and killing the game.
Kosh wrote:I'm watching it again now, and apart from the diabolical start where we let them score two tries through some shambolic play it WAS an improvement. Not much of one, granted, but improvement nonetheless.
We at least attempted to play with more width, and actually succeeded on many occasions. Our tries were well worked and we actually had players in motion and dummy runners.
In the second half we went into our shells and reverted to more of the 5 drives and a kick stuff we know and love.
Don't get me wrong - there is still plenty of improvement required. but I think we made a first, small, faltering step in the right direction tonight.
I dont wish to be negative but watch how many times we played the following plays....
1st....... Drive down middle
2nd.......Drive down middle
3rd........Drive down middle
4th........Thorman with that little cut back ball into the opposite direction that gets read by the opposition every time
5th.........Poor kick
Surely If I can see this then it wont take a super league coach long to realise there is not much variation with the FC game plan !!!!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
