FORUMS FORUMS




  

Home The Virtual Terrace Which clubs should be added to Super League in 2012 + 2015?



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 314 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 32  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:28 pm 
Club Owner
Player Coach
User avatar

Joined: Feb 03 2004
Posts: 10000
Location: Hull
bluesox4evaaa wrote:they are semi-professional. their living income is not solely based upon playing the game of rugby league.


Yes that is correct, and in no way, shape or form goes against what I said.






Image

Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:31 pm 
Player Coach
Fringe Player
User avatar

Joined: Apr 05 2009
Posts: 521
Location: silicone valley
there is a big difference between being a semi-professional and a professional. i wanted to make that clear to those who may not have realised.

Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:50 pm 
Club Owner
Player Coach
User avatar

Joined: Feb 03 2004
Posts: 10000
Location: Hull
bluesox4evaaa wrote:there is a big difference between being a semi-professional and a professional. i wanted to make that clear to those who may not have realised.


No. There is a big difference between semi-professional and fully-professional. Both are still professional. If you are paid to play sport, you are a professional sportsman.






Image

Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:53 pm 
International Chairman
International Chairman
User avatar

Joined: Mar 09 2004
Posts: 33944
Location: watching out for low flying geese
[quote="Wellsy13"]No. There is a big difference between semi-professional and fully-professional. Both are still professional. If you are paid to play sport, you are a professional sportsman.[/quote]

Correct

There are many players in the Championship that do not earn what some people would consider enough money to live on , but they do exist on that pay alone






kcab sfrawdder



Luck is a combination of preparation and opportunity

Just to avoid confusion Starbug is the username of Steven Pike




SOMEBODY SAID that it couldn’t be done
But he with a chuckle replied
That “maybe it couldn’t,” but he would be one
Who wouldn’t say so till he’d tried.
So he buckled right in with the trace of a grin
On his face. If he worried he hid it.
He started to sing as he tackled the thing
That couldn’t be done, and he did it!

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Which clubs should be added to Super League in 2012 + 2015?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:11 am 
Player Coach
Fringe Player
User avatar

Joined: Aug 07 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Wood Green
This thread has been derailed.

I want the posters to go back to the original question

Alice's Phallus wrote:
If you exclude Cumbria, and any new west Yorkshire clubs other than the existing ones, then which clubs would you like to see added in 2012 and 2015 franchises?

I have listed clubs that I think the RFL would be interested in.

Please divide your choices between

(a) minimum two to maximum four Anglo-Celtic
and
(b) minimum two to maximum four continental European,
and
(c) limit the total number to a maximum of six (6) on the grounds of likely availability of quality players by 2015:

Anglo-Celtic

Widnes
Sheffield OR Doncaster
Gateshead-Newcastle
London II
Edinburgh
Glasgow
Dublin
Belfast

Continental European

Toulouse
Paris
Lyon-Rhone
Avignon OR Vaucluse (Avignon and Carpentras)
Marseille
Barcelona

Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:54 am 
Player Coach
Player Coach

Joined: Apr 26 2007
Posts: 12958
Leaguefan wrote:Bet they won't!!!


i got the make up of the current SL spot on before hand.

toulose and widnes are so far ahead of any other possible contenders the others shouldnt even both applying next time round.

the only question to me is do you go to 16 teams or do you kick out some of the current SL clubs.

id prefer a 16 team SL

Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:58 am 
Player Coach
Player Coach

Joined: Apr 26 2007
Posts: 12958
Catalancs wrote:once his 'outdoors time' was over it turned into a decent thread.
albert, dally and damo-leeds should do the club circuit.


please dont mix me up with someone whose only a pretend expansionist.

i get very excited about the sport of RL expanding in the nrl or SL.

i thought the addition of Les Cats and CC was a brilliant step for SL.

i await toulose entry soon as well.

and RL cant afford to exclude a club such as widnes from the SL from much longer.

the other options ive raised are longer term and hardly exaggerated.

gateshead and donny / sheffield are important areas that SL needs to expand too down the track.

and why cant france have more than 2 SL clubs if their applications are good ones. if toulose get into SL, their catchment area will be one of the biggest out of all SL clubs and a good chance to grow into a big club

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Which clubs should be added to Super League in 2012 + 2015?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:38 am 
International Chairman
Club Coach
User avatar

Joined: Aug 18 2002
Posts: 18789
Location: 'Fax fan in Stockport: The jewel in the ring of Manchester
Alice's Phallus wrote:This thread has been derailed.

I want the posters to go back to the original question


:lol: :lol: :lol: Oh the irony of that statement.

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Which clubs should be added to Super League in 2012 + 20
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:53 am 
International Chairman
International Chairman
User avatar

Joined: Oct 13 2004
Posts: 36146
Location: Poodle Power!
Alice's Phallus wrote:This thread has been derailed.

I want the posters to go back to the original question


OK then love, just to show how utterly clueless you are.

Do you actually understand the franchise and how it work, because I don't think you have the first idea.

So a word to the wise, it's not the Lego league, you can't just add and remove bit's just to satisfy the ever changing whims of people like yourself.

SL is made up of 14 Ltd companies with Boards, Shareholders and Employees - all of which are protected by company and employment law - this overides anything the RFL may wish. For any of these companies to have their trading ability compromised will require a lot more than an RFL franchise. Basically for any of the 14 clubs to stand down would require them to have failed to maintain their SL standard to a very large degree. Theoretically if Cas don't get a new ground they could argue that as it was OK last time then their score is the same and seeing as Widnes would not be able to match them on other criteria Cas if they took it to court would win. For any club to step down IMHO it would have to be a near voluntary act and as such unlikey.

Come 2012 and 2015 you cannot just get rid of a club to make way for another. From this point on the franchise is like an MOT test. So long as the existing 14 SL teams meet the criteria for SL and have run their affairs well and been competitive for most of the next three years they are in. They cannot be removed, it's enshrined into the franchise - why do you think they were all so desperate to get it.

Judging on the playing side this season then all clubs except Celtic look assured of a franchise. Even they are unlikely to finish bottom two for all three seasons, for me it's bottom two you need to avoid.

The only clubs in real danger are Wakey, Cas, Saints, Salford, Celtic and possibly Bradford on Stadium issues. The only other club at risk are London and maybe Celtic who's crowds for my money simply can't support a SL club long term.

So assuming all clubs sort their Stadia out then I can't see any losing a frachise.

This means SL needs to expand to 16 teams by 2012 and 18 by 2015 to fit in new teams for your plans to stand a chance.

That will require a 4 million pound a season increase in TV revenue (not including inflation). If you think that will happen you are truly mentally unbalanced.

If you want me to predict SL 2015 I reckon it may be someting like this.
Widnes will replace someone, probably either Celtic or London who may fail
economically or any of a number of clubs that may fail stadium wise.

Toulouse will not last in NL1 and will never make SL IMHO because there isn't enough talent in France to sustain them.

Utterly stupid names such as Glasgow, Paris and Dublin(especially hillarious) will never ever ever play in SL. If you knew anything about the UK you would know that, football is king in these areas and always will be - their simply isn't the interest and there never will be.

I also think the SKY money will reduce as TV gets less and less profitable in which case heartland teams will be far better placed to survive.

So for me possesion is 9/10th of the law and the existing 14 clubs will not be easily budged.

Welcome to the real world.






SUPPORT SWAG...

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Which clubs should be added to Super League in 2012 + 20
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:25 am 
In The Arms of 13 Angels
In The Arms of 13 Angels
User avatar

Joined: Mar 05 2002
Posts: 48326
Location: Londinium
Alice's Phallus wrote:
I want


Tough. Conversations develop. It's their nature.






Doubt everything, even this

Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 314 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 32  Next





It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 7:52 pm


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 4everfax, Wanderer and 759 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 7:52 pm