Joined: Mar 09 2004 Posts: 33944 Location: watching out for low flying geese
Wellsy13 wrote:I aren't trying to twist anything. You're trying to bring up a completely hypothetical argument that you cannot prove right or wrong, so no matter what I reply you will still disagree with. What's the point?
If Wigan, Saints or anyone in the SL didn't meet ANY criteria to be in SL, then I guarantee that they would not be in the SL. Anyone that is trying to argue that they would despite not meeting ANY criteria is simply idiotic.
like the awarding of franchises
kcab sfrawdder
Luck is a combination of preparation and opportunity
Just to avoid confusion Starbug is the username of Steven Pike
SOMEBODY SAID that it couldn’t be done But he with a chuckle replied That “maybe it couldn’t,” but he would be one Who wouldn’t say so till he’d tried. So he buckled right in with the trace of a grin On his face. If he worried he hid it. He started to sing as he tackled the thing That couldn’t be done, and he did it!
Joined: Mar 07 2009 Posts: 359 Location: cas till i die
Wellsy13 wrote:I aren't trying to twist anything. You're trying to bring up a completely hypothetical argument that you cannot prove right or wrong, so no matter what I reply you will still disagree with. What's the point?
If Wigan, Saints or anyone in the SL didn't meet ANY criteria to be in SL, then I guarantee that they would not be in the SL. Anyone that is trying to argue that they would despite not meeting ANY criteria is simply idiotic.
i dont mean if they dont meet ANY
lets just say halifax meet more critia points than Quinns/Wigan etc...would RFL swap them places
Top goes up, bottom goes down....theres no arguments then....make NRL1 more competitve and if your sat at bottom of SL, you need to bck your ideas up or your going down.
Lets not have some people in suits making up ideas of why a team should be there and who shouldnt
Joined: Mar 09 2004 Posts: 33944 Location: watching out for low flying geese
Red Red Robin wrote:Presumably going by the criteria and the decisional will be made by the licence panel.
Which is nothing more than somebodies opinion , and therefore no more relative than yours or mine
kcab sfrawdder
Luck is a combination of preparation and opportunity
Just to avoid confusion Starbug is the username of Steven Pike
SOMEBODY SAID that it couldn’t be done But he with a chuckle replied That “maybe it couldn’t,” but he would be one Who wouldn’t say so till he’d tried. So he buckled right in with the trace of a grin On his face. If he worried he hid it. He started to sing as he tackled the thing That couldn’t be done, and he did it!
classycas2009 wrote:i dont mean if they dont meet ANY
lets just say halifax meet more critia points than Quinns/Wigan etc...would RFL swap them places
Top goes up, bottom goes down....theres no arguments then....make NRL1 more competitve and if your sat at bottom of SL, you need to bck your ideas up or your going down.
Lets not have some people in suits making up ideas of why a team should be there and who shouldnt
No, they wouldn't swap them, because that's not how the process works.
You really need to understand the licensing process more before trying to argue against it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 744 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
_zps67e534e4.jpg)
