Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
Wadski wrote:That could be argued.
Ok, SOME taxes
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:So you were in court, and listened to it, then, did you?
Maybe you'd better dash a letter of to the Sporting Life, BBC etc. who are all reporting that:-
Unless of course on your planet, charging the door and breaking the frame and the lock doesn't count as forcing your way in?
Hey, mr clueless wannabe lawyer.
You do realise that breaking a door does not constitute gaining entry by voilence dont you. So my sentence was correct. As was proved in the court today. The bit from the reports you quoted, is just criminal damage.
Therefore you fail.
Epic Fail.
Your shipment of fail has arrived.
etc
Wigan RLFC - The Biggest Laughing stock in the history of Rugby League.
Last edited by Eurob0y on Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Joined: Mar 05 2002 Posts: 48326 Location: Londinium
t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:Having not been in court for the proceedings, I'd have more faith in the 'British Justice System' than the kangaroo court of RLFans posters.
Eurob0y wrote:There was no evidence from the prosecution to say that either Pryce or Reardon forced their way in.
?
Because that doesn't mention voilence [sic]. In fact, it says that they didn't force their way in. Now, I'm not sure what you'd consider 'force' to be, but I'd say that smashing the door down with a shoulder charge would constitute 'force'. But maybe that's just me.
Eurob0y wrote:You do realise that breaking a door does not constitute gaining entry by voilence dont you. So my sentence was correct.
Eurob0y wrote:There was no evidence from the prosecution to say that either Pryce or Reardon forced their way in.
?
Because that doesn't mention voilence [sic]. In fact, it says that they didn't force their way in. Now, I'm not sure what you'd consider 'force' to be, but I'd say that smashing the door down with a shoulder charge would constitute 'force'. But maybe that's just me.
dave m wrote:Briscoe couldn't get into Wigans Team because of Radlinski even though Radlinski was playing crap at the time still better than old bent nose.
redtillimdead wrote:Oh and as for Briscoe,if he was that fab,why did Wigan see fit to let him leave?
Saint Simon wrote:Thats more likely, to get them to plead guilty on the other charge. The no evidence idea is rubbish, there were two witnesses and the broken door!
...and Reardon has been made to pay costs for the broken door.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 332 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
