dally messenger wrote:and ill repeat, im not saying the ARL should give up an actual game in the 3 game series.
im talking about an off season game so it wont mean we lost a single game.
I am aware of that, and I've given you examples of why a fourth game would devalue the origin concept and brand.
dally messenger wrote:i mean it sure helped the melbourne storm get fans, so clearly theres a spin off.
Thats debateable, they have been on top for those 3 years since. I am sure there were some converted and there still maybe some more after this season
But the main benefits were the new stadium (which should convert into fans) and a cash injection from the Victorian government for the ARL.
The other point to moot is that I would doubt that Quins RL would have the ability to turn any fans from this game into fans of Quins RL. But we'll save that for our own forum.
dally messenger wrote:
and one way you could make sure the players take it seriously is to split any money raised from the game in a way where the winners got most of the money.
players love their coin
Origin is about coin? Finally I highly doubt such a venture would be profitable.
dally messenger wrote:and ive shown many expamples of other sports or teams foreign to the local market being quite succesful.
if RU can do it, why cant RL?
why do well sell ourselves short?
Yet again you fail to see the difference between these sports, their markets, the objectives and the way they were acheived.