RoversTrace wrote:And had it been Westerman or one of their other first team stars, would the decision have been as easy?
The decision has been dealt with by the courts and what the judge, who had all the evidence, considers to be a relevant punishment has been handed out.
Sensationalist journalism from the Hull Daily Mail, no better than the gutter press - wonder how much he's demanding for his story. I won't be buying it tonight.
Not disputing that at all..however 2 clubs involved,media,national audience..recipe for disaster
red al wrote:its not as isolated as you may think, and the sport is not as squeeky clean as a lot of people like to make out. like i said, tommorows chip paper.
Had you followed my posts I was discussing the media circus which now surronds KR & Cockayne. I believe the fact Cas have acted has placed pressure on KR, 2 clubs 2 sets of standards etc..
I do not agree with the media circus..I am aware it is not isolated incident as I have watched the sport for 30 yrs and I am more than aware of off field antics, decent posters can debate this, you however seem unable to do this
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Vicenzo wrote:I am saying that affray is the use of or the threatening of violence.Affray is a more serious charge because it means that there was more than one person involved. In Gerrards case it seems there was n o evidence that he assaulted anyone but the Crown takes the view that he threatened to do so with the crowd he was with. Is that clear enough for you? I also asked, would you still want Crocker to play for you?
Crocker's punishment was a £300 fine for what's been described as a "scuffle". I don't recall reports of him inflicting 7 broken ribs, a broken nose and severe head swelling on anyone, but if you can post a link, fair enough.
Unfortunately RL players have a track record of getting into trouble with nightclub scuffles and the like and both Hull clubs have their fair share. IMO, the clubs (FC included) and the RFL have let them off too lightly with the old "dealt with internally" whitewash. Even you must see, though, that this one, with the sustained and brutal nature of the attack and its consequences in terms of injuries, tips into a different category.
RoversTrace wrote:And had it been Westerman or one of their other first team stars, would the decision have been as easy?
The decision has been dealt with by the courts and what the judge, who had all the evidence, considers to be a relevant punishment has been handed out.
Sensationalist journalism from the Hull Daily Mail, no better than the gutter press - wonder how much he's demanding for his story. I won't be buying it tonight.
Nor me trace, you're wright the HDM is no ne better tha gutter press all my family have alreaady stopped buying it, most of what you read in it thes days is rubbish anyway, it certainly is not the quality paper it used to be once upon a time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum