So not Griffin for confronting Hansen after a fair challenge on Moore?

There's no point, they don't get it.

Next they'll be saying Hansen's challenge was illegal and then walked over to Griffin to throw punches for no apparent reason.

Just watched it again.........IMO there was a split second where he thought about stamping.....watch it again......just after he makes contact with his arm/shoulder but not fist

The LMS example (there were 4 Quins players in total who received significant bans following the end of season Catalan game.......plus Mogg for the Frenchies) is just being used to demonstrate the current bizarre penalties dished out by the RFL, when compared with some last season.

All RL supporters should be looking for consistency from the RFL (you sure as hell will when it is your team that is affected at a crucial point in the season.......it may even make or break your season), but there have been 3 or 4 punch-ups this season involving high profile/not so high profile players and the RFL treatment has been totally random. I don`t give a stuff whether players get banned or not.....I just want all players and club`s to be treated the same.

If Mason had been given a 3 – 4 match ban, would you not have thought he was dealt with harshly when compared to Peacock (been involved in more than one fight already)?

McCarthy-Scarsbrook's recommended charge was No Further Action to 4 games if found guilty, he got 3 games.

Mason's was 1 - 4 games, no hint of No Further Action if found guilty, and got no ban. ????????

You have the power to read minds!?
Could I request some of your time in the next week or so...?

Bentham started it by failing to control either team. Plain and simple.

True.

when?......Tuesday.....er can't do that, but I can see you are free on Wednesday.....is that OK........of course it is, what was I thinking
Look at it again and watch his right leg/foot as he goes in.......

Hmm - first Saints-Leeds, now this. Coincidence that both games were under Bentham's "control"?