Normal rules apply........or apparently not from this...... to this Very very odd.....It's a good job we aren't paranoid about nobody liking us down here

Normal rules apply........or apparently not from this...... to this Very very odd.....It's a good job we aren't paranoid about nobody liking us down here

how can he be found guilty of intentionally striking an opponent and not get a ban?

What a bunch of pansies

BRING BACK THE BIFF!!!

missing the point a little. I have no issue with the ban dished out to LMS last year (good job the bookies didn't notice it...made a mini-killing by backing Castleford the following week), but a little consistancy would be nice.

Was it because LMS was actually sent off within the game?

Either way, there isn't much between the two.

You’ll all be getting site wide bans!

Apart from Alex BP because I can’t ban him!

i'm confused. getting into a brawl punching someone admitting guilt straight up. previous good behaviour. 300 notes and 3 matches.

running halfway across the pitch striking somone. denying it. previous record of general naughtyness. then found guilty no ban.

i think they got these the wrong way round to be honest! surely the sentences got mixed up

lol. It basically says that he didn't get a ban because he didn't injure the player.

LMS pleaded guilty and Manager offered no defence for his actions.

DF was being hit by 3 Wigan players and defended his teammate.

Why didn't the two other Wigan players who obviously ran into the brawl amd where throwing punches get to visit Red Hall? That's the actual Spot the Difference...

Wadski wrote:DF was being hit by 3 Wigan players and defended his teammate. There's the video. http://www.superleague.co.uk/page.php?id=624 Apart Harrison Hansen, tell me which other Wigan players was ''hitting'' Griffin.

Wadski wrote:DF was being hit by 3 Wigan players and defended his teammate. There's the video. http://www.superleague.co.uk/page.php?id=624 Apart Harrison Hansen, tell me which other Wigan players was ''hitting'' Griffin.