We'll be spending upto the salary cap next season, so it's not a case of his unwillingness to spend money. He'll be spending it, but obviously doesn't want to make the same mistakes we have in the past.

Why should we spend money when Andy Lynch is out of contract in 2010 and could sign him for free?
I'd sooner work with what we have got for the rest of the season than spend lots of cash. It's not football, it's rugby league - contracts are valued.

So, the summary at pages 43 is no Gleeson.

Isn't Daniel Levy the spurs chairman who's paid way over the odds for some absolute duck eggs in the last couple of years?

Thats defo not Mr Lenagan....................he's paid balls all for his duck eggs

The summary is that no-one knows

That will not keep many from some IL bashing however.

Levy is the Arsenal one I think?

Ian Lenagan offers 100K for Martin Gleeson and Warrington accept - then what?

The transfer will be blocked under the live cap ruling by the RFL.

We can't release Goulding or Mathers unless they agree to it. So I fail to understand the IL bashing on here.

Same applies to Lynch or Lockyer or anyone else you want for this season. Unless they will play for 30K you can forget it.

Daniel Levy is at Tottenham.

I'm pretty sure he still lives in Upholland.

I'll go knock for him and ask the question, brb in 15....

Ask him why he has a ginger beard too.