kirkamania6 wrote:Really don't get what your point is tbh
That team is our best 17 IMO and yes they lost against Huddersfield doesn't mean there going to lose against Saints. If they play to there capability they have a pretty good chance IMO
If you wana play that game as well, so the team that lost to Wakey(worse than Huddersfield btw) is gonna beat Saints?
Yes there are problems but putting Lockers to SO isn't going to solve them, its going to take a LOT more than that
You could say the same for my team, just cause they lost to wakey doesnt me they would lose to saints. And you started "that game" (in bold) by saying the system that lost to wakey then.
Lockers going 6 would improve our defence on the fringes and he has shown good passing ability. A weakness of Lockers at 6 is obviously his kicking game but lets face it could our kicking game get any worse than it is at the minute.
It also allow Lealuai to move to 9, his best position right? Bit harsh on Macca but I think when Lealuai moves to 9 he becomes our best attacking threat(we havent got many). Give him a quick PTB and he can make a break out of nowhere.
Thats the reasoning for my team
RICHARDS IS SUPERMAN!!!!
Wire_91 wrote:its your first final in about 8 years and now you ravin and rantin about it F**k off, and ill be going old trafford tomoz cheering on the saints and ill be writing on this forum givin you loads of shi* when your drying you eyes and the wire fan will be here handing out the tissues in the thousands, thats if you do take that many fans cause now it looks like its your fans who have jumped on the band wagon now your in a final, this time last year there was only 1000 people in the jjb and now its fillin up cause youve won the league hahaha proper true supporters you are
fazwigan4eva wrote:You could say the same for my team, just cause they lost to wakey doesnt me they would lose to saints. And you started "that game" (in bold) by saying the system that lost to wakey then.
Lockers going 6 would improve our defence on the fringes and he has shown good passing ability. A weakness of Lockers at 6 is obviously his kicking game but lets face it could our kicking game get any worse than it is at the minute.
It also allow Lealuai to move to 9, his best position right? Bit harsh on Macca but I think when Lealuai moves to 9 he becomes our best attacking threat(we havent got many). Give him a quick PTB and he can make a break out of nowhere.
Thats the reasoning for my team
Lockers isn't a 6 nor even a 13 IMO
I think our best combination in the halves is Sam and Tommy so to change that in the middle of a game is not a good idea either especially when we are weakening the halves.
Defence would improve yes but Sam has shown he is more than capable of coping (he wouldn't be in the team if he wasn't) and it will be a good learning curve for him
Tommy's best position is 9 yes but he is also our best 7 and I think Riddell and McIlorum are more than capable of covering the hooking role to a decent enough standard.
You say Tommy's main threat is off a quick PTB, there's nothing stopping him from jumping in at DH if he see's the oppurtunity and he is never too far away from the ruck either.
kirkamania6 wrote:Lockers isn't a 6 nor even a 13 IMO
I think our best combination in the halves is Sam and Tommy so to change that in the middle of a game is not a good idea either especially when we are weakening the halves.
Defence would improve yes but Sam has shown he is more than capable of coping (he wouldn't be in the team if he wasn't) and it will be a good learning curve for him
Tommy's best position is 9 yes but he is also our best 7 and I think Riddell and McIlorum are more than capable of covering the hooking role to a decent enough standard.
You say Tommy's main threat is off a quick PTB, there's nothing stopping him from jumping in at DH if he see's the oppurtunity and he is never too far away from the ruck either.
I would love to see him do that more, hope he does
RICHARDS IS SUPERMAN!!!!
Wire_91 wrote:its your first final in about 8 years and now you ravin and rantin about it F**k off, and ill be going old trafford tomoz cheering on the saints and ill be writing on this forum givin you loads of shi* when your drying you eyes and the wire fan will be here handing out the tissues in the thousands, thats if you do take that many fans cause now it looks like its your fans who have jumped on the band wagon now your in a final, this time last year there was only 1000 people in the jjb and now its fillin up cause youve won the league hahaha proper true supporters you are
kirkamania6 wrote:Depends what sort of instructions Noble gives him
Not much chance of him saying anything constructive
RICHARDS IS SUPERMAN!!!!
Wire_91 wrote:its your first final in about 8 years and now you ravin and rantin about it F**k off, and ill be going old trafford tomoz cheering on the saints and ill be writing on this forum givin you loads of shi* when your drying you eyes and the wire fan will be here handing out the tissues in the thousands, thats if you do take that many fans cause now it looks like its your fans who have jumped on the band wagon now your in a final, this time last year there was only 1000 people in the jjb and now its fillin up cause youve won the league hahaha proper true supporters you are
Joined: Jan 18 2008 Posts: 1708 Location: Edgeley, Stockport
fazwigan4eva wrote:So the team that lost against Huddersfield is gunna be saints
Dont rule that out i mean, would that really shock us
A purple patch inspired on his home ground by man of the match WIGAN CAPTAIN Sean O’Loughlin produced three tries in an eight-minute spell just before half-time, and the GB Lions added two more after the break to maintain Smith’s 100 per cent record as Great Britain coach.
Sat 27th April 2002 St Helens 12 Wigan 21 Edinburgh - Sat 4th May 2002 Celtic 2 Rangers 3 Glasgow (Carlsberg dont do weeks, but if they did.....)
Last Son of Wigan wrote:Richards Pryce Gleeson Carmont Ainscough J Tomkins S Tomkins Prescott Tommy Fielden Hock Lockers Farrell -------------- Feka Riddell Mossop Coley.
Have a good at that one!! Controversial!!
Joel at 6?
He has the play maker style I suppose, but I cant see it.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
