Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 13723 Location: Warrington
Les Boyd Is God wrote:why can u do better if so i`ll look out for your predictions
I have never claimed to be able to.
Live Wired wrote:Nobody said gambling was easy and its a shame you did'nt feel the need to pass comment on my 2 previous posts.
A few of you have actually and also suggested the bookies keep getting it wrong. Hence I've looked out for how the tips on this thread have turned out.
Live Wired wrote:If you've nothing constructive to say on the thread then maybe you'll be wiser if you kept quiet,afterall, you're only making a fool of yourself.
How so? I'm not the one making grand, false, claims!
Joined: Feb 07 2005 Posts: 8642 Location: Home sweet home
SEB wrote:I have never claimed to be able to.
A few of you have actually and also suggested the bookies keep getting it wrong. Hence I've looked out for how the tips on this thread have turned out.
How so? I'm not the one making grand, false, claims!
no ones making any false claims..just a bit of harmless fun by having a flutter to which it sounds like you get great pleasure out of a bet going belly up...also its funny you never posted owt when the winnings were being posted
Joined: Oct 26 2006 Posts: 6212 Location: Republic of Uganda
Les Boyd Is God wrote:why can u do better if so i`ll look out for your predictions
To Be Honest Mate I Followed Your Tips And Dewsbury Were In A Good Position But Just Fell Apart Conceeding 3 Tries In About 7/8 Minutes, Also Leigh I Had At A Bigger Handicap And They Had The Lead...
Anyway You Seem To Know More Information On The National Leagues Than Me So I'll Keep Looking Out For Your Bets...
Joined: Feb 07 2005 Posts: 8642 Location: Home sweet home
The Joker® wrote:To Be Honest Mate I Followed Your Tips And Dewsbury Were In A Good Position But Just Fell Apart Conceeding 3 Tries In About 7/8 Minutes, Also Leigh I Had At A Bigger Handicap And They Had The Lead... Anyway You Seem To Know More Information On The National Leagues Than Me So I'll Keep Looking Out For Your Bets...
not really mate...90% is down to luck..livewired does a good spread..but like me its always one that lets you down,but its all good fun and adds to the interest...may have a punt this weekend with teams getting a big start cos owt can happen in cup rugby
Joined: Aug 11 2003 Posts: 1494 Location: Warrington after many years of wandering
Les Boyd Is God wrote:not really mate...90% is down to luck..livewired does a good spread..but like me its always one that lets you down,but its all good fun and adds to the interest...may have a punt this weekend with teams getting a big start cos owt can happen in cup rugby
Yep, Hull let me down this week on my treble and I didn't have a single cover bet Although Hull would have been my single I think. Made some money on Fartfreely when he was here for 1st try scorer. We only played down one wing
I mean she even cooks me pancakes
And Alka Seltzer when my tummy aches
If that ain't love then I don't know what love is
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 13723 Location: Warrington
Les Boyd Is God wrote:no ones making any false claims..just a bit of harmless fun by having a flutter to which it sounds like you get great pleasure out of a bet going belly up...also its funny you never posted owt when the winnings were being posted
Apologies if I've been misunderstood. I don't take pleasure out of people's bets failing. It's just that when LiveWired starting posting recently, he made several claims that the bookies don't know what they are doing when it comes to RL and there are some easy pickings out there. I made the point that sport always has the capacity to be unpredictable no matter how good your knowledge and so I would be surprised if anyone could consistently beat the bookies.
Rugby league is easy to make money on especially in single bets.i do 1 main single and a treble based on the handicap marks I produce.
more often than not,my marks are pretty similar to the high street,but when they differ,they do big time because I have strong views about certain teams.Namely
Warrington,who to me are distinctly average and the league table is backing this up.
Castleford,who are easily a top 6 outfit,but the bookies dont think so.
Skolars,who are simply the worst team to play pro rl and in 4 years of rl handicapping have the lowest rating I have ever given to a team.
I'm also very wary wary of backing cumbrian teams away from home,as I dont believe they travel well.
My marks are based on my own opinion and to me,if the high street are more than 6points/game different to mine,then they are wrong.Dont forget,there are only 3 main rl handicappers,4 if you include supersoccer and they pretty much work out there marks in the same way.Others like Hills,Lads etc,just copy to within 4 points of the tote/skybet and 365.
OK,these are my handicaps for this weeks challenge cup.these are only my guide,but a based on all teams (except superleague) being at full strength,obviously players injured or being rested among the lower league clubs,will affect the final handicaps.
Wakefield -32 v +32 Leigh
Halifax -12 v +12 Widnes
Sheffield -18 v +18 Dewsbury
Swinton -22 v +22 Rochdale
Hull KR -18 v +18 Celtic
Harlequins +4 v -4 Huddersfield
Warrington -56 v +56 York
Oldham -40 v +40 Lezignan
Leeds -4 v +4 St Helens
Keighley +36 v -36 Castleford
Catalans scr v scr Bradford
Featherstone -66 v +66 Wath Brow
Hull fc -26 v +26 Salford
Doncaster +2 v -2 Gateshead
Barrow +24 V -24 Wigan
Batley -28 v +28 Hunslet
Joined: Oct 16 2004 Posts: 3422 Location: warrington
Live Wired wrote:OK,these are my handicaps for this weeks challenge cup.these are only my guide,but a based on all teams (except superleague) being at full strength,obviously players injured or being rested among the lower league clubs,will affect the final handicaps.
Wakefield -32 v +32 Leigh Halifax -12 v +12 Widnes Sheffield -18 v +18 Dewsbury Swinton -22 v +22 Rochdale Hull KR -18 v +18 Celtic Harlequins +4 v -4 Huddersfield Warrington -56 v +56 York Oldham -40 v +40 Lezignan Leeds -4 v +4 St Helens Keighley +36 v -36 Castleford Catalans scr v scr Bradford Featherstone -66 v +66 Wath Brow Hull fc -26 v +26 Salford Doncaster +2 v -2 Gateshead Barrow +24 V -24 Wigan Batley -28 v +28 Hunslet
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Kevin Turvey, lister and 262 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum