Boris wrote:Well if this is all they will provide then one is well within their rights to go online and seek other avenues to view the NRL.
Apart that is from within law where there is no such right. And so consequently the AUP where anyone who wished to test it will find themselves asserting their right to use other web sites.
That warning not specifically aimed at you, Boris, but I am sure anyone who it does applies to knows who they are.
gutterfax wrote:alas...."invitation to treaty", not trades description.
Cannot see how that would apply. You cannot make an invitation to treat for something you do not have to offer. If anything protects Setanta is would be the contract which would no doubt allow them to change their offering.
Ande wrote:With the loss of games in the Premiership a lot of people will be revoking their subscription i feel and they cant rely on Magners League and IPL within England as they arent widely watched so that could be an explanation
They are a season and a bit early then as they do not lose any games until the 2010-2011 season.
Michael.