Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 1016 Location: Sydney, Australia
BP1 wrote:That would give each club only 10 home games apiece, resulting in a sizeable drop in revenue. There is also the matter of the Sky Tv contract. This would also take us back to the uneven fixture list which we've only just managed to get rid of.
Each club could still have 13 home games, the same as now, they would merely be restructured. In:
* SL - 10 home games
* Northern Rail Cup - 3 home games (assuming a structure of 8 pools of 4 clubs).
This format could be negotiated for the new contract, and while there might be a reduction in the value for SL's deal, increases in the value of the NRC and a significantly expanded test program would make up for the shortfall.
With respect to an uneven fixture list, if by that you mean that clubs would not play all teams at "home and away" - well the fact is that there is no perfect fixture list, but allowing the expansion of the international game will help all levels of the game. Consider 1) that the NRL has not run on a H&A basis for nearly almost the past 30 years 2) Many current and former NRL players, coaches and administrators have said that even the current club fixture list is excessive.
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 1016 Location: Sydney, Australia
roughyedspud wrote:moving rounds 4,5 & 1/4s of the challenge cup to midweek which will free up 3 weeks..
Its one possible solution, but it would be preferable to not schedule any midweek games, which reduce preparation and recovery for the players, and are less convenient for the fans.
IMO Rounds 4 & 5 could be moved to mid February and beginning of March respectively, on the bye weekends of the Union Six Nations, where they used to be. Rounds 1 to 3 could be moved to weekends in November, December and January. This would mean they would make a smaller impact on SL, yet it would not clash with other BBC events.
However, the Cup Quarters, Semis and Final could be retained on weekends in June, July and August to placate the BBC. These are the rounds where the Cup gets serious and heats up anyway.
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
The Observer wrote:Each club could still have 13 home games, the same as now, they would merely be restructured. In: * SL - 10 home games * Northern Rail Cup - 3 home games (assuming a structure of 8 pools of 4 clubs).
This format could be negotiated for the new contract, and while there might be a reduction in the value for SL's deal, increases in the value of the NRC and a significantly expanded test program would make up for the shortfall.
With respect to an uneven fixture list, if by that you mean that clubs would not play all teams at "home and away" - well the fact is that there is no perfect fixture list, but allowing the expansion of the international game will help all levels of the game. Consider 1) that the NRL has not run on a H&A basis for nearly almost the past 30 years 2) Many current and former NRL players, coaches and administrators have said that even the current club fixture list is excessive.
It's a notable idea, reducing the SL fixture list to accommodate another competition (albeit lesser) as well as an expanded international programme. However, what you have failed to mention is where the knock-out stages come in to all of this? That's three more fixtures on the list. Unless they schedule them mid-week, they'd have to expand the fixture list still.
Post subject: Re: Should We Have The Play Offs In July/August?
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:08 pm
gutterfax
International Board Member
Joined: Aug 13 2003 Posts: 20966 Location: The Shaky Isles
Damo-Leeds wrote:I don’t know how we’d structure this but this is an idea I have in my mind.
Let's rename the JJB the David Whelan Stadium
dally messenger wrote:was watching an nfl doco. on one of their teams and they used the term bomb to describe those long high passes from quaterback to running back and i think gibson took that idea, realized you cant throw the ball forward in RL and adapted it to a "bomb" kick we have
eels fan wrote:You poor poor obsessed fat ex vichyballin potato thieving stoaway.
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 1016 Location: Sydney, Australia
Wellsy13 wrote:It's a notable idea, reducing the SL fixture list to accommodate another competition (albeit lesser) as well as an expanded international programme. However, what you have failed to mention is where the knock-out stages come in to all of this? That's three more fixtures on the list. Unless they schedule them mid-week, they'd have to expand the fixture list still.
The NRC Quarter, Semi finals and Final could run over three straight weeks until the first week of October. Players involved in the Cup would still get a 3 month off-season, and start in February next year, which is reasonable. England/GB test players would hopefully get close to 3 months offseason and start playing again in late Feb-early March.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 370 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum