Gleeson looked out of his depth and never made an impact in SL. He looks right at home playing for Fax in NL1.

one thing in support of clarke, he's a great tackler

can anyone deny that ?

his defence is good.

i just think gleesons pace at the ruck and darting runs would be better suited to our style of play than clarkes obviousness in attack.

We'd be more obvious if we had two hookers playing the same style, do you not think?

not really.

i find higham and glees unpredictable in what there going to do.

i find clarkey extremely predictable. its either a pass, or a slow failed attempt to break the line from dummy half himself(i.e yesterday, when he made about a metre from acting half, and threw the ball to the ground. was predictable from the stands.)

his defence is his strong point though.

Clarke tackles like a revolving door him and Briers would be best placed at the front of Debenhams

wire 74 wrote:Clarke tackles like a revolving door him and Briers would be best placed at the front of Debenhams check out wires 2 top tacklers last season http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... 09&hp2=263

wire 74 wrote:Clarke tackles like a revolving door him and Briers would be best placed at the front of Debenhams check out wires 2 top tacklers last season http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... 09&hp2=263

lots of people on here, some crap about him being 3rd man in after tackles completed.

I didn't say he stood out or that he had a great game, I said decent game. It just seems that people decided a while back that he was garbage and not fit to play for Warrington and people love to knock him at any given opportunity.

Floppy.