Wellsy13 wrote:All I can say is what is their job? To entertain. Do they do that? No. Far from it. I don't find it entertaining to watch a small group of school-girls doing out-of-time pelvic thrusts. And certainly don't find a school-boy dancing femininely entertaining either - even if he is better than the rest. Whoever their choreographer is needs asking a lot of questions about entertainment if they think any of that is good.

It all just looks a shambles. Embarrasing. Unprofessional. Either do it right or get rid. Just because it's free doesn't mean it's good. They wouldn't employ me to replace Motu Tony if I said I'd do it for free, would they!

benraineyfc wrote:They arnt the teen angels last night the original ones are aged 15-19 and are actually very good.

UllFC wrote:indeed, they can't even be bothered giving them some uniforms anymore

Neil HFC wrote:think thats stretching the truth a little, "less bad" may have been more appropriate.

XxHONEYxX wrote:by going to bulls last week there cheerleader squads were excellent and enjoyable pre match entertainment. last nights was embarrasing and they cant even keep in sequence very bad.

barton baird wrote:If I can recall correctly,the Bulls cheerleaders are quite fit.