Tiger Bond wrote:So you lost because you played so poorly, and not just because we were the better side? Story of our season, we don't get enough credit.
You weren't the better side, we was pretty equal, except the ridiculous mistakes we made more than you.
Not a personal attack on you mate, it just annoys me how the so called 'smaller sides' like us and Wakefield don't get the credit we deserve when we put in a good performance. The leading comment is always on how poor the 'bigger' team played.
Irregs #16 wrote:We were poor, too many dropped passes, holding back in the defensive line, wrong options on critical plays - eg yeamo keeping hold and not putting briscoe over, berro at the end offloading when he should have died with the ball on the 4th to set up for a drop goal, dowes forcing a pass after his break in the first half.
I really enjoyed cas's attacking play and sherwins flat pass was outstanding, but we nearly beat you playing poorly, and yes you were the better side, but had we have sneaked it, we would have still said it was poor
You had a 100% record, and were really on fire. Yet all of a sudden, you were just really poor? Nothing to do with us playing well.
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Tiger Bond wrote:You had a 100% record, and were really on fire. Yet all of a sudden, you were just really poor? Nothing to do with us playing well.
Did you listen to what we were doing? Unforced error after unforced error. Threw away at least one nailed-on try. Only kicked one goal from 4 attempts.
And you still only beat us by a point.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
we was poor, fc played dumb rugby yet still managed to outscore cas 4-3, ultimatly tickles missed kicks cost us. cas were a pleasure to watch tonight keeping the ball alive, but, the amount of drop ball we gave you, leeds, sts would've wracked up 30 by half time, thats the difference between the top 2 and the rest
Last edited by number 6 on Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Surely for you to play poor there has to be some compromise, i.e. us being good attributed to your drop in performance levels.
It could be said you were forced into mistakes etc. At least it is nice to see some Hull fans being respectful in defeat and admitting that for once there was some good play from Cas, rather than - like Sky and the SLS (and some other fans on RLFans) completely discrediting the scorelines, and just saying it was a bad day at the office for the opposition.
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Fully wrote:Surely for you to play poor there has to be some compromise, i.e. us being good attributed to your drop in performance levels.
It could be said you were forced into mistakes etc. At least it is nice to see some Hull fans being respectful in defeat and admitting that for once there was some good play from Cas, rather than - like Sky and the SLS (and some other fans on RLFans) completely discrediting the scorelines, and just saying it was a bad day at the office for the opposition.
Bless.
You were the better side and deserved the win.
That's not saying much, mind.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
