t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:We fought for 100 years for a free gangway for players - it works both ways. There will always be players coming up through the ranks to replace them.....and that's because there is no serious union played in our 'heartlands' - Sale and Leeds excepted, just two clubs across the M62 corridor.
Kids aren't growing up wanting to play for Sandal or Stanley Rodillions are they?
The funnier story is union losing it's 'talent' to French RU where there is money galore to be had, and trying to force those players not to leave because they won't be watched by the England management team. Even the 'Man of Biscuit' has been linked with a cross-channel move.
No it works one way, and that is the problem.
The quality of our International team is reliant on both quantity and quality, we occasionally have quality but we never have the quantity.
The cap works in Australia as they have both, we in England do not. I have no idea how losing one of the British games best prospects who is a bloody good player already can be brushed off as ok as they will be others coming through.
Smith a few years ago was rated along with Inglis as the top prospect in World rugby league, Inglis kicked on Smith had a few lean years but he is now moving forward again and who knows where he could finish as a player.......well if he is any good in union like the rest of them.
As someone who has invested time and money into the development of junior players at 3 SL clubs including Wakefield this kind of it does not matter attitude stuns me.