Joined: Apr 02 2003 Posts: 8463 Location: west of west hull
i found it a bit odd tbh. surely the match fitness would be good for him and you cant just not play fully fit players incase they get injured
The Independent (May 2007) wrote:Today the east [of Hull], which contains the biggest council estate in Europe, is poor, a place of high unemployment and low expectation. The west, which has the city centre and the university, is posh and prosperous.
Bighead wrote:i found it a bit odd tbh. surely the match fitness would be good for him and you cant just not play fully fit players incase they get injured
You really are full of it. If he got injured whilst playing for the Warriors you'd be the first on here berating the club for allowing him to play.
Bighead wrote:i found it a bit odd tbh. surely the match fitness would be good for him and you cant just not play fully fit players incase they get injured
I find youi a bit odd, as you would rather him be played, and injured...
Joined: Feb 29 2004 Posts: 53 Location: Kingys Gang
1865 wrote:I find youi a bit odd, as you would rather him be played, and injured...
im with you joe,but would be a right kick in the jewels if he gets injured
Paintboy (Rob Chadwick) said "I hate them (Hull FC) to such an extent i wish they would go bust and disappear never to be seen or heard from again."
How professional from KCFM's resident Rovers commentator.
Bighead wrote:i found it a bit odd tbh. surely the match fitness would be good for him and you cant just not play fully fit players incase they get injured
It's a fair argument. I think the thing is that because Hull have no control of the situation that 'their' player is in, if he gets injured then it's on their heads.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
_zps67e534e4.jpg)
