RLFANS.COM -

Page 1 of 2

[ 18 posts ]

Go to page 1, 2 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

Post subject: Lauiki not to play for warriors

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:05 am

Bet Lynch

Club Coach

Joined: Aug 04 2008
Posts: 16983

http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... p?ID=11646

Hull have step in and asked that he does not play in the match.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:36 am

The Dentist Wilf

Player Coach

Joined: Dec 07 2005
Posts: 7402

Good move I think they are expecting to get the green light in the next 14 days!

Thing for me is though he sounds as if he is really ready to go and pretty impressive! Quite an exciting signing!

2016 The Year of the Airlie Bird -on sale NOW, price £15, BUY THE BOOK RE-LIVE THE DREAM!

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:50 am

willowred

Player Coach

Joined: Nov 21 2007
Posts: 1565
Location: East hull

Makes sense the last thing you would want is for him to play and get injured

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 9:19 am

Bighead

International Board Member

Joined: Apr 02 2003
Posts: 8463
Location: west of west hull

i found it a bit odd tbh. surely the match fitness would be good for him and you cant just not play fully fit players incase they get injured

The Independent (May 2007) wrote:Today the east [of Hull], which contains the biggest council estate in Europe, is poor, a place of high unemployment and low expectation. The west, which has the city centre and the university, is posh and prosperous.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 9:28 am

Smiggs

Club Owner

Joined: Jan 30 2004
Posts: 9673
Location: Hull

Bighead wrote:i found it a bit odd tbh. surely the match fitness would be good for him and you cant just not play fully fit players incase they get injured

You really are full of it. If he got injured whilst playing for the Warriors you'd be the first on here berating the club for allowing him to play.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 9:33 am

Roland_R

Moderator

Joined: Oct 12 2004
Posts: 11727
Location: Hull

Bighead wrote:i found it a bit odd tbh. surely the match fitness would be good for him and you cant just not play fully fit players incase they get injured

I find youi a bit odd, as you would rather him be played, and injured...

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:36 am

shane A

Club Owner

Joined: Feb 29 2004
Posts: 53
Location: Kingys Gang

1865 wrote:I find youi a bit odd, as you would rather him be played, and injured...

im with you joe,but would be a right kick in the jewels if he gets injured

Paintboy (Rob Chadwick) said "I hate them (Hull FC) to such an extent i wish they would go bust and disappear never to be seen or heard from again."
How professional from KCFM's resident Rovers commentator.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:45 am

Danny 2

Club Coach

Joined: Oct 12 2004
Posts: 10075
Location: hull and proud

well done hull

i dont blame them we cant afford an injury

19-0 GAME OVER

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:47 am

FC_TILL_I_DIE

Player Coach

Joined: Feb 21 2009
Posts: 257
Location: next door to cravan park

great call by ull

''Rugby League is a simple game played by simple people. Rugby Union is a complex game played by w@nkers''

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:04 am

Wellsy13

Club Owner

Joined: Feb 03 2004
Posts: 10000
Location: Hull

Bighead wrote:i found it a bit odd tbh. surely the match fitness would be good for him and you cant just not play fully fit players incase they get injured

It's a fair argument. I think the thing is that because Hull have no control of the situation that 'their' player is in, if he gets injured then it's on their heads.