Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 7735 Location: Here there and everywhere
The Key wrote:Not read the thread, but Calderwood could be the biggest waste of a signing I have seen if things carry on (but then again, I only started going to rugby all the time in 2002). I have not once seen him used properly in the games so far. It's early days so hopefully things will change
Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 7735 Location: Here there and everywhere
Banger wrote:He hasn’t performed particularly well so far (we are only four games into the season FFS), but the same could have been said about other recent wingers – at least Calderwood is probably earning a hell of a lot less and not tying up a quota spot.
He hasn't seen the ball FFS. He hasn't cost us anything in defence. He has not performed badly.
Joined: Feb 21 2009 Posts: 257 Location: next door to cravan park
Mild mannered Janitor wrote:Nail hammer thwack.
But to some its his fault he doesn't get the ball
he may not get the ball, but he's rubbish under the high ball. any team can see this so they aim there kicks at him. the sooner raynor gets back the better
Joined: Feb 09 2008 Posts: 9342 Location: King George Dock
FC_TILL_I_DIE wrote:he may not get the ball, but he's rubbish under the high ball. any team can see this so they aim there kicks at him. the sooner raynor gets back the better
Why Raynors not much better under the high ball!
Regardless of Raynor coming back or not, Calderwood won't be dropped for Gaz.
"You don't have to be great to start, but to be great you have to start".
Joined: Mar 03 2004 Posts: 5397 Location: West Hull
scarrie wrote:Indeed. From what I've seen Briscoe is just as iffy under the high ball at present but nobody is getting on him back.
I'd say he's much more iffy, plus he's worse positionally in defence. He'll always have a much greater impact in attack though, due to how we play/our wingers are used.
dave m wrote:Briscoe couldn't get into Wigans Team because of Radlinski even though Radlinski was playing crap at the time still better than old bent nose.
redtillimdead wrote:Oh and as for Briscoe,if he was that fab,why did Wigan see fit to let him leave?
trys'r'us wrote:I'd say he's much more iffy, plus he's worse positionally in defence. He'll always have a much greater impact in attack though, due to how we play/our wingers are used.
And yet people still expect Calderwood to be dropped. If you watch most games on Sky you will see wingers all over the comp being put under pressure by great kicking games, our wingers are no worse or better than any other teams imho
djcXIII wrote:And yet people still expect Calderwood to be dropped. If you watch most games on Sky you will see wingers all over the comp being put under pressure by great kicking games, our wingers are no worse or better than any other teams imho
True.
Let's see how he goes on the drier pitches and how he attacks when we stop squeezing him into the corner before we pass to him.
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
trys'r'us wrote:I'd say he's much more iffy, plus he's worse positionally in defence. He'll always have a much greater impact in attack though, due to how we play/our wingers are used.
But, but, he's the best young prospect since Shaun Edwards. I said it the other day, but I really fear we've got another good one we'll build up and tear apart if we're not careful.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum