Joined: Feb 15 2003 Posts: 3781 Location: Standish..
They were running at Tomkins all night and Sam never missed a tackle.A few times it was pure 1 on 1 and he never looked out of depth. Great technique round the legs.
Bailey did nothing spectacular he was just solid as usual.
- Neil - wrote:They were running at Tomkins all night and Sam never missed a tackle.A few times it was pure 1 on 1 and he never looked out of depth. Great technique round the legs.
Bailey did nothing spectacular he was just solid as usual.
He did.
He missed the one when Menzies scored.
But, what I liked about him is that he was really annoyed with himself for missing that tackle.
Sam has a brilliant attitude, and is not a player who will go hiding if things go wrong for him (which at sometimes they will). He has belief in his own ability.
Did you see him shouting at the forwards during the game?
SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row Saints have five in a row
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20429 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Red Hot Jalapeno wrote:I said for ages that Baileys best games for Wigan have been at centre. I was made up when Noble put him back there last week. This was another thing Jonh (super coach) thought he knew best on telling everyone that Bailey would no longer work at centre for some unknown reason.
Go back and reread my posts on this issue, your obsession with me is becoming quite flatering by the way.
I said Bailey struggles against pace in the backline this is further compounded by the fact we used this move 2 forward and hold defensive line, we certainly have not used this as much in the second half againsts Quins or as much against Bradford, where we moved forward and met them, holding just prior to contact rather than holding 5 feet from contact.
The defence we play works against a flat ball game assuming we do hold closer to contact, but is still risky when a team plays a deep backline, like Cas and Trinity did as we hold too far from contact and it gives the ball handler time and space to get up to speed or make a decision.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Red Hot Jalapeno wrote:I said for ages that Baileys best games for Wigan have been at centre. I was made up when Noble put him back there last week. This was another thing Jonh (super coach) thought he knew best on telling everyone that Bailey would no longer work at centre for some unknown reason.
Looks to me like Jonh and Nobby finally agree on something! BN wants to sign a centre - and I don't think it's to replace Carmont.
Joined: Nov 20 2002 Posts: 3136 Location: Ashton,Wigan
jonh wrote:Go back and reread my posts on this issue, your obsession with me is becoming quite flatering by the way.
I said Bailey struggles against pace in the backline this is further compounded by the fact we used this move 2 forward and hold defensive line, we certainly have not used this as much in the second half againsts Quins or as much against Bradford, where we moved forward and met them, holding just prior to contact rather than holding 5 feet from contact.
The defence we play works against a flat ball game assuming we do hold closer to contact, but is still risky when a team plays a deep backline, like Cas and Trinity did as we hold too far from contact and it gives the ball handler time and space to get up to speed or make a decision.
No amount of technical jargon and back-tracking will disguise the fact that you rubbished the few of us who said we needed to move Bailey back to centre.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20429 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Red Hot Jalapeno wrote:No amount of technical jargon and back-tracking will disguise the fact that you rubbished the few of us who said we needed to move Bailey back to centre.
sorry for posting a valid response to yours filled with analysis and reason, how silly of me.
I would also like to see where i "rubished" it, i simply said that under the systems we were employing i did not think it would work, seems to me until we changed this system it did not. My issue was with allowing defenders time and space to run at him, when they have on several occasions including against Quins he looked totally lost, against Bradford we cut down the space and it worked well, so again rather than trying to use it to have a pop, you actually prove my concerns were well founded. Thanks
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Users browsing this forum: adi, Fujiman, Google Feedfetcher, Wigg'n and 345 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum